CTT hands down. The cayenne is the best vehicle ive owned and that includes a g55, x5, s550, bentley gt, f430 etc

Ive driven the M suvs and frankly there is no way they are quicker than the ctt, and if mods come into play a simple ecu can get you far superior performance.

Good luck

 

I had both the cayenne turbo and x5m and prefer the full size rover supercharged to both. Gives much more room in back seat and trunk, much more comfortable, vastly better looking, and much better winter/off road capabilities if needed. Plus I am fortunate to have other fast cars so really did not see the point in owning a sporty truck, as when I take the truck I just want to comfortably cruise w/ the family or go slow in bad snow storms. If you only have 1 car then I understand the benefit of having a sporty fast SUV, but I really did not like either.

 

Is your X5M at Rosilyn Porsche now??

 

Of the two X5M to CTT, which did you prefer?

 

I agree and disagree with what you are saying. My CTT is modified to over 600hp/tq and I have another much faster car the GT2 which is at 620 to 650hp/tq. And I still lust over the RR supercharged. I owned an 07 model and loved it, and from what I read the new model is 2 seconds faster to 60mph, has a much better suspension for handling and comfort, and the infotainment is much improved. So with that info and the fact that I already have a very fast car, I went to the dealer to drive the new model.
Since my normalcy is the CTT my perception is flawed. The new RR felt like a big fat pig, too slow, leaned way too much around turns, and the high end sound system sucked. This is all because I was DD my CTT, so in comparison that was my impression. My CTT has all the goodies like PDCC, Burmester sound system, and much more. So as much as I still love the RR, the CTT just made it feel so blah. If I had money to burn than I would have both because I still love RR.

 

Love our CS, the CTT will be incredible!

 

Range Rover?? Suspect quality issues combined with the traditional (read ugly IMHO) box design and slow virtually define PIG in the automotive field. While it has offload conquered, for me I'm not heading out on safari where the RR rules so the only choices for uber SUV/SAV are the X5M and CTT. The X5, while impressive, is just not as moving and qualifies as more "pedestrian" from a visual perspective. I've owned an X5 (not X5M) and they are far too common and visually not as "moving" as what it seems the CTT has captured. Just my .02.

Btw - I'm biased as a p-car owner (911TT, CTT) but have seen, owned and driven them all but the Porsche is more moving than the other choice in terms of appearance and interior.

 

Range Rover?? Suspect quality issues combined with the traditional (read ugly IMHO) box design and slow virtually define PIG in the automotive field. While it has offroad conquered, for me I'm not heading out on safari where the RR rules so the only choices for uber SUV/SAV are the X5M and CTT. The X5, while impressive, is just not as moving and qualifies as more "pedestrian" from a visual perspective. I've owned an X5 (not X5M) and they are far too common and visually not as "moving" as what it seems the CTT has captured. Just my .02.

Btw - I'm biased as a p-car owner (911TT, CTT) but have seen, owned and driven them all but the Porsche is more moving than the other choice in terms of appearance and interior.

 

It 's more comfortable the X5 M or the CTT? Ride comfort while traveling etc..

I tried for three days X6 M and I found it fantastic, very comfortable and fast!!! I know Porsche is more luxurious..

So.. I'm very undecided...

 

Panny doesnt seat 5!