1.8 vs 3.0 pros and cons
Oct 20, 2009 | 11:20 PM
#12
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,301
From: DC
Well to semi-shed light on the actual topic.
I had a 2.0T A4. I got it chipped, put on a downpipe, intake, ect. To make 260ish crank HP.
The 3.2 came stock at 260ish.
If I would go back I would pick the 3.2. Unless you are going K04 or BT setup for high HP. Well I guess the MPG is worse in the V6 then the 4 Turbo.
I had a 2.0T A4. I got it chipped, put on a downpipe, intake, ect. To make 260ish crank HP.
The 3.2 came stock at 260ish.
If I would go back I would pick the 3.2. Unless you are going K04 or BT setup for high HP. Well I guess the MPG is worse in the V6 then the 4 Turbo.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbotronic
Cayenne | Panamera | Macan
8
Mar 16, 2010 12:06 AM
Racerfan
General Automotive & SUV Forum
1
Feb 24, 2008 03:08 PM
Bookmarks
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)