What's fastest ? Turbo S vs GTR vs LFA vs SLS
#53
10-28-2011, 11:46 AM
Wow, another 3 geniuses bashing a Lexus with a bunch of stupid speculation. Definitive! Did you run out of random claims to pull out of your ass for me to hilariously debunk?
The LFA isn't about being faster than a 911 in a straight line...! Oh snap! As stated in my initial post, a cheap chevy more or less "annihilates" all your "expensive but not as expensive as the LFA" that have actual racing heritage - and you still seem to be able to appreciate them? Hypocrite much?
Logic: | | . <-- you
So you hate Toyota/Lexus/Japanese cars. That's great. Stop pretending you have some kind of rationale for it, you don't. I dismantled it... thoroughly, and repeatedly - and I didn't resort to calling you a nimrod, even though you obviously are.
"kthxbai"
The LFA isn't about being faster than a 911 in a straight line...! Oh snap! As stated in my initial post, a cheap chevy more or less "annihilates" all your "expensive but not as expensive as the LFA" that have actual racing heritage - and you still seem to be able to appreciate them? Hypocrite much?
Logic: | | . <-- you
So you hate Toyota/Lexus/Japanese cars. That's great. Stop pretending you have some kind of rationale for it, you don't. I dismantled it... thoroughly, and repeatedly - and I didn't resort to calling you a nimrod, even though you obviously are.
"kthxbai"
#57
11-02-2011, 10:32 PM
What an amazing collection of cars! LFA still hits the sweet spot no matter what the results are... c:
#58
11-03-2011, 10:31 AM
I don't understand the LFA hate, here. Aston-Martin came out with a supercar called the One-77. Yes it is a supercar as they not only advertised it as one, but built it like one. They claim a 0-100 km/h time of 3.7 seconds and a maximum speed of 220 mph. Built to only 77 units, the car cost $1.7 million U.S. Nothing of its performance was independently verified. The car never broke any track records nor any track times were recorded. The car never competitively raced. I don't see any outrage. I don't see anyone calling it an overpriced POS. Is there a double standard going on here? What possible argument is there to defend it?
#60
11-03-2011, 10:47 AM
Last edited by Monaco; 11-03-2011 at 10:49 AM.