Thinking about a Rolex Deep Sea Sea Dweller (DSSD)
Jul 25, 2012 | 06:57 PM
#3
Thread Starter
| Teamspeed's Howitzer
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,273
I wear 44 and 45mm watches. Rolex's look wimpy otherwise. This little morsel is 44mm.....
But someone did say the bracelet w/ 44mm looks odd, is that what you were thinking?
But someone did say the bracelet w/ 44mm looks odd, is that what you were thinking?
Jul 25, 2012 | 07:26 PM
#5
Seriously. Change it.
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,505
From: Sonoma, CA
It's only awkward for people with small wrists. I have large wrists, wear it as my daily most of the time and love it. It feels solid and well engineered, unlike most watches in that price range. Feel free to pm me with any questions or post them here in this thread.
Jul 25, 2012 | 07:56 PM
#6
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 31,554
From: Zoo York
I think you are referring to the 43mm Deep Sea?
It sits rather awkward as it's incredibly top heavy with the standard bracelet that is shared down the line. These Images are from watchuseek and you can see it's way top heavy INMO. I went with the 42mm explorer as a daily steel instead. Again not my wrist or pics but maybe this helps you.
43mm Deep Sea vs 40mm Sea Dweller below:
It sits rather awkward as it's incredibly top heavy with the standard bracelet that is shared down the line. These Images are from watchuseek and you can see it's way top heavy INMO. I went with the 42mm explorer as a daily steel instead. Again not my wrist or pics but maybe this helps you.
43mm Deep Sea vs 40mm Sea Dweller below:
Jul 25, 2012 | 08:02 PM
#7
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,926
From: Houston, TX
Boomsauce, if you got some big manly arms that make a Sub look small, then this might be the watch for you.
