When does your collection require a Rolex?
#11
Good question, I ask myself the same thing on occasion.
I'm not sure I'll ever want one. I recognize they are fine timepieces but I just go the opposite way about the "status" that they come with. I appreciate the understated more.
In an oil and gas town like Houston they are everywhere. Subs are ubiquitous.
Once in a while I get an itch and go try one on, usually cures it. Just don't like them on my wrist.
** I reserve the right to change my mind in the future. I now own some pieces I never thought I would!
I'm not sure I'll ever want one. I recognize they are fine timepieces but I just go the opposite way about the "status" that they come with. I appreciate the understated more.
In an oil and gas town like Houston they are everywhere. Subs are ubiquitous.
Once in a while I get an itch and go try one on, usually cures it. Just don't like them on my wrist.
** I reserve the right to change my mind in the future. I now own some pieces I never thought I would!
Last edited by Boardman; Jan 4, 2012 at 12:40 AM.
#12
Rolex is a watch sold at 1000's of jewelry stores across the US. I think I can buy them in 4 locations near are little mall south and possibly 10 places in downtown Seattle.
It's "the" expensive mall store watch therefor the masses think its what rich people wear. I think too many buy them for this reason alone. For every very nice Rolex wearer i have met and I've met MANY, I've met 50 duchebags that wear em for the reactions.
I wear my watches for me and no one else tho I enjoy sharing them here and fchat. My good friends and family have no clue what my watches mean to me or even if they cost more than $1.98 each. I hope to keep it that way. My dad knows I'm an idiot about cars and watches but he's got no clue that my pieces are expensive. My wife does
. She's it.Rolex says look at me. While I did buy one 20 years ago it was and still is a very subtle watch black face black leather strap and I haven't sold it as i don't like selling my pieces even tho I've worn it once in 20 years.
As Boardman states we all grow. Into watches or out but we grow.
My watch is my extension of my personality. I tend to like off the wall. Off the mainstream stuff, I won't change. Rolex is just way to mainstream.
#13
I agree that I like the individuality in my current collection - still trying to figure out what is an extension of my personality though - or maybe I have split personalities
#14
I have actually grown to hate them. My first proper watch was a Datejust which is hidden in a drawer today, and I had a Deep Sea which I absolutely loathed in every single way. And while I actually like the history of the Daytona and how it looks, it's not really for me in a "Hello, pleased to meet you - I have no imagination, so here's me and my Rolex" -sort of way.
#18
So, I'm building a small collection of nice timepieces. Not that it is a rule, but I tend to pick up watches in the 5-15k range. I've always considered a Rolex to be an old man's watch (my dad had one and he was definitely and old man - still is). The more I think about it though, they are great pieces, and seemingly bulletproof. I've seen a couple that I like (Explorer I and Milgauss)...maybe I'm becoming the old man.
My question is this.
1. At some point do should you really add a Rolex (obviously if you hate them, no, but they provide versatility that some other don't - for example a trip to Europe with business meetings and days out in jeans).
2. Are the Explorer I and Milgauss good examples that will hold their value well?
My question is this.
1. At some point do should you really add a Rolex (obviously if you hate them, no, but they provide versatility that some other don't - for example a trip to Europe with business meetings and days out in jeans).
2. Are the Explorer I and Milgauss good examples that will hold their value well?
As to whether they hold their value, I paid $630 for the Rolex Explorer 1 (model 1060). Check the value today. ($21,600 for the 911, BTW)
Eventually sold the 911 but still have the Explorer 1. No interest in any other Rolex. Had a brief 'affair' with a steel Daytona but exchanged it for a VC Overseas which I enjoy much more. The new Explorer is a more contemporary size and may be worth a look... I am sure you are old enough for one now!
#19
Most vintage I don't have a desire for. Rolex definitely wouldn't be one. Craigger likes posting Vintage Omegas and I think some of those look great. Would love a vintage PP
Bought my first Rolex the same year as my first 911... 1976. I was NOT an old man (although I am now! LOL).
As to whether they hold their value, I paid $630 for the Rolex Explorer 1 (model 1060). Check the value today. ($21,600 for the 911, BTW)
Eventually sold the 911 but still have the Explorer 1. No interest in any other Rolex. Had a brief 'affair' with a steel Daytona but exchanged it for a VC Overseas which I enjoy much more. The new Explorer is a more contemporary size and may be worth a look... I am sure you are old enough for one now!
As to whether they hold their value, I paid $630 for the Rolex Explorer 1 (model 1060). Check the value today. ($21,600 for the 911, BTW)
Eventually sold the 911 but still have the Explorer 1. No interest in any other Rolex. Had a brief 'affair' with a steel Daytona but exchanged it for a VC Overseas which I enjoy much more. The new Explorer is a more contemporary size and may be worth a look... I am sure you are old enough for one now!






