Ok guys, talk me off the ledge on this one..
Dec 18, 2011 | 11:10 AM
#31
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,273
by the way, for historical context, just remember that just a handful of years ago, both the Royal Oak and the Nautilus were considered super ugly and overpriced (at much lower prices than they are now!). General tastes change, so you're always best off going with what you really like as long as you plan on keeping it for a long time.
Dec 18, 2011 | 11:57 AM
#32
Rolex Fanboy
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 8,638
From: In a dream....please don't wake me
by the way, for historical context, just remember that just a handful of years ago, both the Royal Oak and the Nautilus were considered super ugly and overpriced (at much lower prices than they are now!). General tastes change, so you're always best off going with what you really like as long as you plan on keeping it for a long time.
The Nautilus grows on you a little but still low on the PP list for. Me
Dec 29, 2011 | 05:38 PM
#35
Teamspeed Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 31
have to agree with steve
I love this AP. I prefer the steel version. Its even better in person than in the pics. Its obviously very different than the Nautilus. If resale value has anything to do with it buy the Patek but if it does not go for the AP as the much more interesting watch in my opinion
Dec 29, 2011 | 05:50 PM
#36
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,320
I love this AP. I prefer the steel version. Its even better in person than in the pics. Its obviously very different than the Nautilus. If resale value has anything to do with it buy the Patek but if it does not go for the AP as the much more interesting watch in my opinion
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bookmarks
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)