The Rose Bowl
Jan 1, 2009 | 07:01 PM
#12
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,188
From: Oregon
Jan 1, 2009 | 07:09 PM
#13
Teamspeed Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 385
dude the quacks have soo much cash from the shoe empire it is not even funny
they should have all of the SC cast offs, but who wants to live in rain year in and year out
the players want to be in the city of fun -- show time
they should have all of the SC cast offs, but who wants to live in rain year in and year out
the players want to be in the city of fun -- show time
Jan 1, 2009 | 07:14 PM
#15
Thread Starter
| Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,466
From: NY
USC should have played Texas in the Rose Bowl. This game is meaningless to their national title claim, everyone knows the Big-10 sucks. If they had blown out Texas on the other hand that would be a different story.
I know the Pac-10 will go 5-0 but there still haven't been any REAL match ups between the good Pac-10 and Big-12/SEC schools beside Ok. State which IMO doesn't count (they are a good team but not top 3 in the Big-12).
Don't get me wrong, USC is an amazing team and MAY be the best in the country. But until they play and beat FL/Texas/Oklahoma/TT it is too hard to compare them.
I know the Pac-10 will go 5-0 but there still haven't been any REAL match ups between the good Pac-10 and Big-12/SEC schools beside Ok. State which IMO doesn't count (they are a good team but not top 3 in the Big-12).
Don't get me wrong, USC is an amazing team and MAY be the best in the country. But until they play and beat FL/Texas/Oklahoma/TT it is too hard to compare them.
Jan 1, 2009 | 07:17 PM
#16
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,188
From: Oregon
It seems to be working pretty well so far, we've had a consistent supply of great RB's, some great defensive players (we're going to miss Patrick Chung and Nick Reed), and a few good QB's. I'm very happy with what we did considering this years QB situation. We're firmly the second best team in the PAC 10.
Jan 1, 2009 | 07:19 PM
#18
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,188
From: Oregon
USC should have played Texas in the Rose Bowl. This game is meaningless to their national title claim, everyone knows the Big-10 sucks. If they had blown out Texas on the other hand that would be a different story.
I know the Pac-10 will go 5-0 but there still haven't been any REAL match ups between the good Pac-10 and Big-12/SEC schools beside Ok. State which IMO doesn't count (they are a good team but not top 3 in the Big-12).
Don't get me wrong, USC is an amazing team and MAY be the best in the country. But until they play and beat FL/Texas/Oklahoma/TT it is too hard to compare them.
I know the Pac-10 will go 5-0 but there still haven't been any REAL match ups between the good Pac-10 and Big-12/SEC schools beside Ok. State which IMO doesn't count (they are a good team but not top 3 in the Big-12).
Don't get me wrong, USC is an amazing team and MAY be the best in the country. But until they play and beat FL/Texas/Oklahoma/TT it is too hard to compare them.
Jan 1, 2009 | 07:25 PM
#19
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,188
From: Oregon
I agree with the first part of your post. Who wants to see Ohio State get eaten by Texas anyway?
