Notices
Photography | Art Show off your artistic side! Talk about the latest gear and trends in the world of photography and fine Art here!

What do you think about these lenses for my D90?

Old Feb 26, 2009 | 01:16 PM
  #11  
503Alex's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Teamspeed Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 38
From: Portland, OR
503Alex You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!503Alex You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!503Alex You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!503Alex You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!503Alex You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!503Alex You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!503Alex You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!503Alex You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!503Alex You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!503Alex You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!503Alex You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!
Originally Posted by Alzilla
^^^ Don't worry, it's the same lens. Neither of those lens are top shelf quality (obviously) but they should suit you fine for awhile if this is your first DSLR. As your budget increases, you will probably want to pick up some faster glass (i.e. f/2.8 or faster). Don't worry about buying these right away, but here are some other inexpensive lenses that are really important to have:

Nikkor 50mm AF-D f/1.4
Tamron 17-50 AF f/2.8
Sigma 70-200 AF f/2.8

While the Tamron and Sigma both overlap focal lengths compared to lenses you'll already be getting, they are lightyears better in terms of both speed (focus time as well as faster shutter speeds in low light situations) and build quality. I threw the Nikkor 50mm f/1.4 on there because I just feel that everyone should have that lens in their camera bag. I got mine used for about $250, but if you really want to do it on the cheap, look for the Nikkor 50 f/1.8, which can be found for less than $100 and is nearly as fast and sharp as the f/1.4.

If you have any other questions about Nikon gear and lenses, please feel free to ask and I'll be happy to help in any way I can!
Thanks for clearing that up! I'll definitely take your advice and spend some time with these before upgrading.

Would you recommend these lenses over the stock 18-105 if I were to sell/trade before I open them?
 

Last edited by 503Alex; Feb 26, 2009 at 01:19 PM.
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 01:47 PM
  #12  
jayboat's Avatar
Teamspeed Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 599
From: Naples, FL
jayboat has a reputation beyond reputejayboat has a reputation beyond reputejayboat has a reputation beyond reputejayboat has a reputation beyond reputejayboat has a reputation beyond reputejayboat has a reputation beyond reputejayboat has a reputation beyond reputejayboat has a reputation beyond reputejayboat has a reputation beyond reputejayboat has a reputation beyond reputejayboat has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by daedalus
Right now i'm still on a D70s for the time being with a Nikon 18-70, and a Sigma 70-300mm which are really cheap basic lenses... However, swapping lenses gets annoying, at least with the kind of photos I take so I was wondering if you knew of a lens that could accomplish what both of those do...

Is there such thing as a 18-300mm? Relatively inexpensive? (i'm not exactly a pro!)
Nikon makes an 18-200 that is a mofo. Next on my list. It ain't what you could call relatively inexpensive, tho.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LaneS@macarbon.com
Photography | Art
6
Dec 10, 2010 11:23 AM
EVO
Photography | Art
15
Apr 23, 2010 09:42 PM
Super D
Miscellaneous
0
Oct 26, 2009 10:02 PM
Hovik
Miscellaneous
1
Aug 1, 2009 07:15 PM
MiniD
Photography | Art
9
May 22, 2008 11:13 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:25 AM.