Notices
McLaren McLaren MP4-12C, F1, & More Discussion Forum.

McLaren back at the Ring' with the P1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 14, 2013 | 08:10 PM
  #171  
wtdoom's Avatar
Teamspeed Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 413
wtdoom has a reputation beyond reputewtdoom has a reputation beyond reputewtdoom has a reputation beyond reputewtdoom has a reputation beyond reputewtdoom has a reputation beyond reputewtdoom has a reputation beyond reputewtdoom has a reputation beyond reputewtdoom has a reputation beyond reputewtdoom has a reputation beyond reputewtdoom has a reputation beyond reputewtdoom has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Peloton25
That doesn't answer the question I posed and Porsche are not the ones publicizing these details.

>8^)
ER
Porsche had wige solutions take the vid and do the timing in front of independent observers . That is more than Ferrari or mclaren have had the balls to do . Also a lot of what you call " details" is just gossip as far as I'm concerned .
 
Old Nov 14, 2013 | 09:56 PM
  #172  
Peloton25's Avatar
McLaren Fanatic
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,578
From: California, USA
Peloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by La Artist
Why there is such focus on these tests?
well ask mclaren that went over there and rented out the track to set times.
I didn't say tests, I said TIMES.

I certainly get why testing at the Ring is valuable to these manufacturers. No doubts about that at all and I would even argue the point with Captain Slow if given the opportunity.

>8^)
ER
 
Old Nov 14, 2013 | 10:29 PM
  #173  
Peloton25's Avatar
McLaren Fanatic
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,578
From: California, USA
Peloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by wtdoom
On to p1 ; Not releasing a time is fine do that ( it's commendable in some ways and what I told them to do months ago lol ) but don't go claiming to beat a or b without proof , that's just low character bs . Talk is cheap , either don't talk or back it up ; simple .
McLaren haven't claimed to have beaten anyone - they said they reached their goal, then added "comfortably".

The fact that some won't believe them without proof is fine - I'm not here to convince anyone of McLaren's results as I realize I can not offer proof.

McLaren are apparently due to bless us [] with a multimedia presentation of some sort in the near future, so we'll probably get to repeat all these same old debates when that arrives. #yippee

You know the old saying, "I can't wait till Tuesday..."

Originally Posted by wtdoom
Porsche had wige solutions take the vid and do the timing in front of independent observers . That is more than Ferrari or mclaren have had the balls to do . Also a lot of what you call " details" is just gossip as far as I'm concerned .
I get that Porsche tried to present an air of transparency with their efforts this time, but independent observers from a magazine and a private film crew are hardly the oversight that is needed for these times from any manufacturer to be considered legitimate.

We can take their word that these were production cars just the same as we can take McLaren's word that they set their sub-7:00 time, right?

Given the complexity of systems in these cars any of them could easily be tweaked to enhance performance - non-critical systems/components could be shed to save weight, tires could be supplied with special compounds, suspension settings altered, power delivery enhanced, more aggressive brake pads fitted, transmission shift times improved and so on. If the car only needs to survive for a few days of hammering around the Ring there's not a great concern to longterm reliability, lifecycle of components, or the function of things like the rear wing hydraulics - were they present in these 918s?

An observer from Sport Auto Magazine isn't going to have a clue about all those things. They didn't even raise the issue of Porsche tucking the windscreen wiper down in the cowl and out of the airstream which is not where it will be placed on production cars. If something as simple as enhancing the aerodynamics to whatever nth degree that benefited them mattered to the team and was clearly altered, what other liberties might have been taken that could not be seen?

Now I'm not here to slag off your precious - I think the 918 is great and if you have decided its the car for you then I hope you will be tremendously pleased having one in your collection. We should all be so fortunate. It's still the marketing influence of Ring times I have an issue with - it has gotten completely out of hand and far too much stock is put into the numbers.

>8^)
ER
 
Old Nov 15, 2013 | 10:14 AM
  #174  
koizu's Avatar
Teamspeed Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 872
koizu You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!koizu You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!koizu You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!koizu You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!koizu You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!koizu You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!koizu You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!koizu You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!koizu You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!koizu You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!koizu You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by Peloton25
McLaren haven't claimed to have beaten anyone - they said they reached their goal, then added "comfortably".

Man...just listen to Ron Dennis at 8:21 +


 

Last edited by koizu; Nov 15, 2013 at 10:16 AM.
Old Nov 15, 2013 | 11:10 AM
  #175  
boyko23's Avatar
Teamspeed Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 33
From: Sofia, Bulgaria
boyko23 has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Cheating in F1 before, now BS in the automotive industry... Ron Dennis trademark!
 
Old Nov 15, 2013 | 12:06 PM
  #176  
Peloton25's Avatar
McLaren Fanatic
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,578
From: California, USA
Peloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by koizu
Man...just listen to Ron Dennis at 8:21 +
Thank you captain obvious. We all know what Ron said at Geneva in March - I'm talking about now. I've already mentioned that they were clearly working to a different plan back then and if they could rewind the tape and make some edits they probably would.

Those comments are what people in the investment world call forward looking statements, usually coupled with a disclaimer that there are no guarantees of results. In this case, there is a result, but they have decided not to be specific.

The table for all the bitter people is over there. -->

>8^)
ER
 
Old Nov 15, 2013 | 02:41 PM
  #177  
koizu's Avatar
Teamspeed Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 872
koizu You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!koizu You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!koizu You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!koizu You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!koizu You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!koizu You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!koizu You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!koizu You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!koizu You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!koizu You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!koizu You are a Teamspeed member that Rocks and Rolls!
Originally Posted by Peloton25
Thank you captain obvious. We all know what Ron said at Geneva in March - I'm talking about now. I've already mentioned that they were clearly working to a different plan back then and if they could rewind the tape and make some edits they probably would.

Those comments are what people in the investment world call forward looking statements, usually coupled with a disclaimer that there are no guarantees of results. In this case, there is a result, but they have decided not to be specific.

The table for all the bitter people is over there. -->

>8^)
ER
As they say: "There's none so blind as those who will not see"

Time to take off you rosecoloured glasses and see the big picture.
 
Old Nov 15, 2013 | 03:58 PM
  #178  
Peloton25's Avatar
McLaren Fanatic
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,578
From: California, USA
Peloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond repute
I have the benefit of knowing what McLaren achieved with the P1 at the Ring and recognize their statements have turned from boastful to humble. Being guilty of changing their mind is hardly the grave injustice some want to make it out to be, and again, this is all over a Ring time that in the grand scheme of things isn't all that important.

The P1 is a world beater and if you and others need physical proof to recognize that you are just going to have to wait.

>8^)
ER
 
Old Nov 15, 2013 | 04:03 PM
  #179  
Peloton25's Avatar
McLaren Fanatic
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,578
From: California, USA
Peloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond reputePeloton25 has a reputation beyond repute
Getting back on point of this topic, I'm borrowing a post from Fabian/fytl on McLife who is a future P1 owner and attended one of the preview drive opportunities in Woking and at Dunsfold today. This info should put to rest some doubts, I would hope.

Originally Posted by ftyl
Two VERY important things regarding the Hybrid drive that I have learned this trip:

The P1 can regen in all kinds of situations, even in full throttle scenarios. I will not go into details, since I tried explaining things here many times and most people ignore it anyway or do not understand it fully. I had a good long chat with one of the main hybrid tech guys (Andy was present) and what he explained made perfect sense. (And made even more sense after talking a little with Chris about it too.)

Trust me and accept when I tell you, it all makes sense. The Hybrid regen system they have developed is staggeringly good. It regens battery power all the time, it does so very quickly. It uses up to the full 130kw of the e-motor to do so depending on scenario, it also sometimes uses very little... Whatever it can do, it will regen without losing ANY power required on the wheels.

When you watch the battery charge meter jump up and down constantly when tracking the car or just driving it, you realize how good it is at it! Also, important to realize, we drove the cars constantly for a good hour or more, fast, slow, lighting, everything you can think of. And the power never ran out in any shape or form!

One comment that I think shows this even better was that Chris said, in the last years driving all of the P1 XPs and PPs, not a single time did they HAVE to actively charge one. Not a single team did the battery deplete or the car lose some of its power.

Also, regarding the whole "what about the second lap of Nordschleife" questions everyone keeps asking... McLaren's goal for the Hybrid system's regen capability is based on the Ring. Their goal is, that when doing one lap of the Ring, the car has to have enough battery power to do the final very long straight from start to finish without running out of battery power for it. Once it passes that straight, then next turns and not full throttle parts are enough to recharge it again so that once it gets back to the long straight, it again has enough power. The car will run out of fuel before battery power, and when it gets empty, put it into E-Mode, drive to the petrol station and fill it up....

Love this machine...
>8^)
ER
 
Old Nov 15, 2013 | 04:25 PM
  #180  
quickZohsix's Avatar
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,266
From: St. Peters, MO (outside STL)
quickZohsix has a reputation beyond reputequickZohsix has a reputation beyond reputequickZohsix has a reputation beyond reputequickZohsix has a reputation beyond reputequickZohsix has a reputation beyond reputequickZohsix has a reputation beyond reputequickZohsix has a reputation beyond reputequickZohsix has a reputation beyond reputequickZohsix has a reputation beyond reputequickZohsix has a reputation beyond reputequickZohsix has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Peloton25
Getting back on point of this topic, I'm borrowing a post from Fabian/fytl on McLife who is a future P1 owner and attended one of the preview drive opportunities in Woking and at Dunsfold today. This info should put to rest some doubts, I would hope.



>8^)
ER
Now that is cool!
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 PM.