Maserati MC - Project of the Week - No Kidding
#31
08-27-2012, 02:25 PM
One of the most commonly asked question is how well does Spectra PhotoSync compare with other window tint products. So we decided to actually put Spectra PhotoSync to test against a 5% metallic limo tint. Now keep in mind, the shades we used for comparison is PhotoSync65, 55, and 45, so much lighter compared to limo tint at 5%. There is also one major difference - the limo tint has metals in it so it can produce some decent heat rejection that would be comparable to a lighter ceramic based tint:
Prestige Film Technologies Ultimate Window Tint - WOW! - YouTube
Prestige Film Technologies Ultimate Window Tint - WOW! - YouTube
Commonly asked question:
What is the shades available?
75%, 65%, 55%, 45% and 35% to come soon according to the manufacturer
What is the warranty?
Lifetime Warranty from bubbling, fading, peeling, purpling, and cracking
#32
09-04-2012, 12:34 PM
For those not familiar with Spectra PhotoSync, it is a nano window film that will adjust its nano properties to perform better when exposed to direct solar radiation (sunlight). The result is the film's heat rejecting properties begin to change to block up to 98.5% of infrared rays. This video below shows this effect:
Manufacturer: Prestige Film Technologies (prestige-films.com)
Manufacturer: Prestige Film Technologies (prestige-films.com)
Last edited by Premier Protective Films; 09-04-2012 at 12:43 PM.
#33
09-09-2012, 07:42 AM
Conducted another test since we have been receiving inquiries to test PhotoSync against ceramic
Test: PhotoSync vs. a leading ceramic tint at 40%
*on the Maserati, we had installed PhotoSync75 on the windshield and 45% on the sides + rear
Test: PhotoSync vs. a leading ceramic tint at 40%
*on the Maserati, we had installed PhotoSync75 on the windshield and 45% on the sides + rear
#34
09-11-2012, 11:53 AM
Another test we conducted recently. With Prestige Film Technologies' Spectra PhotoSync Nano Window Film. We decided to document this test to show how well this product performs compared to a leading 30% ceramic tint. The previous test was done compared to a ceramic 40%. Test specs:
Spectra PhotoSync 65% (yes, we are using a lighter film to compare with a darker 30% ceramic tint)
*product to the left
VS.
30% Ceramic (one of the more popular ceramic tint products on the market....sorry, we are not going to name the manufacturer of this product, but can say it is likely the most well-known on the market)
*product to the right
Conditions:
Outdoor Temperature: 75 degrees
Test Time: 2pm
Measurement Equipment: BTU Meter aimed directly at the window films to obtain simultaneous readings for accuracy
Test Subject: Raging Gray Bull named the Aventador
Spectra PhotoSync 65% (yes, we are using a lighter film to compare with a darker 30% ceramic tint)
*product to the left
VS.
30% Ceramic (one of the more popular ceramic tint products on the market....sorry, we are not going to name the manufacturer of this product, but can say it is likely the most well-known on the market)
*product to the right
Conditions:
Outdoor Temperature: 75 degrees
Test Time: 2pm
Measurement Equipment: BTU Meter aimed directly at the window films to obtain simultaneous readings for accuracy
Test Subject: Raging Gray Bull named the Aventador
#35
09-30-2012, 08:01 PM
To note, this video below shows how PhotoSync compares to a very popular ceramic 40% tint. However, this comparison was done at Spectra PhotoSync's pre-activation phase. In short, PhotoSync's Solar Adaptive Coating did not activate to produce maximum heat rejection, which means it will perform even better when exposed to solar energy for approximately 15 minutes.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DJ
Maserati | Alfa Romeo | General Italian
4
08-01-2012 06:42 PM
DJ
Maserati | Alfa Romeo | General Italian
5
08-03-2011 05:54 PM
Bookmarks
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)