EVOMS Releases a 700+ HP Performance System for the 2011 GT2RS - Details Inside
Apr 29, 2011 | 05:01 PM
#41
Teamspeed Rookie
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 10
Toby,
Thanks for the kudos.
Re: Car 1 and Car 2. Car 1 was the car that did 215 at the mile. KPG's personal car, which I believe may have been making less torque at that time. If my memory serves me the 60-130 on that run was roughly 4.5X. Car 2 was the car that did 231 at the mile. Joe's Car.
Thanks for the kudos.
Re: Car 1 and Car 2. Car 1 was the car that did 215 at the mile. KPG's personal car, which I believe may have been making less torque at that time. If my memory serves me the 60-130 on that run was roughly 4.5X. Car 2 was the car that did 231 at the mile. Joe's Car.
BTW, when are you getting the 1500 WHP TTG, those numbers should go over quite nicely here...
Apr 30, 2011 | 12:26 AM
#43
Banned
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,272
From: Houston/Manchester
Ben, the run that was 215 was making much less tq since it was not the E85 tune and no, it did not do a 4.5 60-130. It was around mid to high fives at the mile. Tom did do a 4.8 60-130 at the mile with his 218 run. I never really did get a chance to fully utilize that setup since the ring and pinion grenaded on the second run. Although I loathe predictions, I would think it a safe assumption that this E85 setup would eclipse the previous performance numbers, assuming the engine failed to grenade as some would predict...or hope?
BTW, when are you getting the 1500 WHP TTG, those numbers should go over quite nicely here...
BTW, when are you getting the 1500 WHP TTG, those numbers should go over quite nicely here...
As for a TTG, that's a little ways away for me. I'm hoping in a year or two. Going to stick with p-cars for the time being. Trying to upgrade now ......
Jun 3, 2011 | 05:38 AM
#44
Teamspeed Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 307
Do we have any more feedback from EVO as to how their power graph at 4000rpm reads 505hp which equates by formula (which is not subject to insane hype) to 898NM at 4000rpm ?
I am very disappointed and disturbed that a company which can and does push the boundaries for their 1 mile drag racers can produce the drivel below....
A GT2RS in the configuration they present cannot make more than about 660PS DIN - I have data logs of acceleration of one tuned to this level..... does EVO want to show their acceleration logs ? say 100-250kph ? (flat surface please no 6 bling slopes
)
I am very disappointed and disturbed that a company which can and does push the boundaries for their 1 mile drag racers can produce the drivel below....
A GT2RS in the configuration they present cannot make more than about 660PS DIN - I have data logs of acceleration of one tuned to this level..... does EVO want to show their acceleration logs ? say 100-250kph ? (flat surface please no 6 bling slopes
)
Jun 7, 2011 | 09:01 AM
#46
Teamspeed Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 121
From: South Florida
LOL, I wish I had that kind of problem
Jun 7, 2011 | 11:56 PM
#48
Teamspeed Senior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 602
From: Montreal
yeah but isnt he kinda right about the HP - TQ discrepancy on the graph? they are related by formula...
May 4, 2012 | 07:34 AM
#49
Teamspeed Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 307
The power curve "works" over 4500rpm but below this is doesn't. IMO this is a chassis dyno attempting to measure too much turbo torque by calculating a value based on a 6 second light load dyno run and failing spectacularly...
This engine does NOT have 737ftlbs....