The GT2RS/GT2 Picture Thread......Go!
#3203
04-13-2012, 10:45 AM
HI GT Cole,
Hmm..you owned a GT2RS and sold it again...and replaced it with a 4.0..- well both cars are great..but the hell why didnt you keep them both??
Arent you missing the turbo power form the GT2RS?
greetings,
Hmm..you owned a GT2RS and sold it again...and replaced it with a 4.0..- well both cars are great..but the hell why didnt you keep them both??
Arent you missing the turbo power form the GT2RS?
greetings,
#3205
04-13-2012, 02:01 PM
well - yes and no. I know the GT2RS quite well too - its power delivery is very linear..improved from the normal GT2...so..that argument doesnt really count (at least not for me)..
But..anyhow..the 4.0 is also great..on average I would say it looks better - -sounds better.. - but performance wise..nothing can beat a turbo..
But..anyhow..the 4.0 is also great..on average I would say it looks better - -sounds better.. - but performance wise..nothing can beat a turbo..
#3206
04-13-2012, 02:04 PM
yes because the powerband on the turbo is really comparable to the 4.0 isnt it
#3207
04-13-2012, 02:13 PM
GT3RS and GT2RS are two completely difference beasts. The GT3 platform was designed with tracking in mind whereas the GT2 is a combination of tracking and all out performance and the "turbo" powerband is not quite as "predictable" or linear as a naturally aspirated engine no matter how you look at it.
#3208
04-13-2012, 02:24 PM
GT3RS and GT2RS are two completely difference beasts. The GT3 platform was designed with tracking in mind whereas the GT2 is a combination of tracking and all out performance and the "turbo" powerband is not quite as "predictable" or linear as a naturally aspirated engine no matter how you look at it.
btw: we all know that the GT3 also only really pulls above 5000rpm..so its not really "linear" either..
I heard the 4.0 is better in this respect..but I have never driven it..
