Finally Revealed C63 AMG Black Series
#51
07-08-2011, 09:41 AM
^ This. Man you guys are harsh, can't believe all the dissing this car is taking, I personally think it looks incredible. It will be a real looker in person. Do want.
#52
07-08-2011, 11:26 AM
Stoppie- you can buy clkbs's for 60-70k all day long. That us a fraction of the estimated 100-120k for the c63bs. I am not saying the c63 bs isn't awesome. I am just saying it doesn't offer much more over a standard 2012 P031 C63. P031 cars have proven over and over that they are producing more than the claimed hp. That puts it over 500 and within a few hp of the BS. The interior is standard on the BS. Nothing special. The BS offers very little over the standard C63 is all I'm saying. I have wanted this car for quite some time and may still buy it so no dissing here. I think it will clean up nice
just depends on final features and pricing.
just depends on final features and pricing. 
#55
07-20-2011, 07:25 AM
Stoppie- you can buy clkbs's for 60-70k all day long. That us a fraction of the estimated 100-120k for the c63bs. I am not saying the c63 bs isn't awesome. I am just saying it doesn't offer much more over a standard 2012 P031 C63. P031 cars have proven over and over that they are producing more than the claimed hp. That puts it over 500 and within a few hp of the BS. The interior is standard on the BS. Nothing special. The BS offers very little over the standard C63 is all I'm saying. I have wanted this car for quite some time and may still buy it so no dissing here. I think it will clean up nice just depends on final features and pricing.
just depends on final features and pricing.Why people are even comparing this to the DTM is beyond me. It was and still is 3x the money.
The problem I have with it is, it seems that MB is taking away the exclusivity that the BS had. The CLK BS was based off the F1 safety car and the SL BS was just bonkers! Both had very limited runs. This just seems like a lightly modded C63.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using Teamspeed
#56
07-20-2011, 09:18 AM
The Coupe looks worse than the Sedan. This can only happen with MB. They took the good looking C, removed the rear doors and that's it. The result is a poor looking MB.
Four seats? How will you get in unless you'll crawl between the front seats and the B Pillar? The back of the seat is fixed so... really?
The M3 CRT is the product BMW should have aimed for.
Fail!
Four seats? How will you get in unless you'll crawl between the front seats and the B Pillar? The back of the seat is fixed so... really?
The M3 CRT is the product BMW should have aimed for.
Fail!
#58
07-20-2011, 03:41 PM
The only CLK BS that i've seen for 60-70k have 50k miles on them. If you want one that's clean your're still looking at a 90k+ asking price. Also, other than the lack of rear seats, there was nothing special about the CLK BS interior either. With that said, I do agree with most here and like the CLK BS more too but that was 120k when it was new.
Why people are even comparing this to the DTM is beyond me. It was and still is 3x the money.
The problem I have with it is, it seems that MB is taking away the exclusivity that the BS had. The CLK BS was based off the F1 safety car and the SL BS was just bonkers! Both had very limited runs. This just seems like a lightly modded C63.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using Teamspeed
Why people are even comparing this to the DTM is beyond me. It was and still is 3x the money.
The problem I have with it is, it seems that MB is taking away the exclusivity that the BS had. The CLK BS was based off the F1 safety car and the SL BS was just bonkers! Both had very limited runs. This just seems like a lightly modded C63.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using Teamspeed
