I couldn't agree more. That's 2 threads on this forum that are misinterpreting/misunderstanding (in my opinion) some very important figures in the auto industry.

From what I read, he was complimenting Porsche...but when asked if he was referring to the 911, he said no & actually was referring to the CGT. Doesn't seem like a big deal to me, and of course there's a language barrier involved as well. So what if he said no many times or quickly, he was paying a compliment to the CGT and didn't want to confuse that with the 911.

 

^This!

 

Even if he does really dislike the 911, who cares what one man likes or dislikes.
It's interesting news to hear his reasons but in the end it's just the opinions of one man.
I love that one company out there has stuck with a successful formula for eons....while creating other products that have made it into the mainstream.

 

Great Post.

 

Well what one has to remember is the 911 is still a fantastic car at less than a 10th of the price of the revised price of the Huayra. Overall it's nothing on it maybe, but it's an absolutely different type of car.

 

I agree with Horacio that the F1 of 20 years past is leaps and bounds more aesthetically pleasing than the P1.

 

p1 is ugly as *uck...it looks like a frog.. lol

 

This is not a porsche bashing thread. Who cares if one man has a different opinion? No need for everyone to come in and refute what he said nor vouch for porsche's greatness

 

911 > pagani

 

Curves vs. Angles. He's an angles guy....... like Darth Vadar was.

So what?