Alex
What's the power difference with the 3.8L compare to 3.6?

 

50whp I believe shark told me... and about 60lbs of TQ, right shark?

 

anything w/ regard to turbos spooling up faster/ more trq under the curve?

 

with ms109s you're dead right. The curve looked quite different.....

 

Everything to do with that

 

have any dyno's (from similar conditions if possible) of a similarly equipped 3.6 vs 3.8?

 

I second this! Shark where are these dynos . I mean seriously 730awhp is alot for 21psi and a bit hard to believe. I know these turbos have a bunch of creep what did u end up with at high rpm's 23-24 psi? believe its the creep that is giving his these hi peak numbers. 730rwhp is easily believeable but AWHP thats alot. I would really like to see this on a graph compared to your old gt800. thanks

regards,

Suman

 

I'm going to have to side with Suman on this, I've been part of projects that produce big numbers however that figure converts to ~900 crank horsepower. I'd like to see a dyno graph to confirm also.

-Maciek

 

With 18% drive train loss? Not 900... a smidge above 820 or so. I don't have electronic versions of it. Feel free to ask EVO since that's who dynod it. 23.6psi is NOT low boost. That's a lot of boost on largish turbos. Dynos that aren't engine dynos are pretty meaningless numbers to me other than to show the difference of one particular car before/after and monitoring AFRs/timing during tuning. You guys know I used to go to the track and you could always extrapolate from that... Probably bringing the turbo down to the HRE event in socal late this month so i'll probably redyno and see how she's doing health-wise at GIAC nearby.

Eddie Bellos projects were pretty crazy.

 

There's some stuff that was posted like that from EVO on some site....