Can someone explain to me why the Nautilus 5711 in steel is so damn expensivo?
#15
11-26-2009 | 02:12 AM
Thread Starter
| Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,524
From: Stockholm, Sweden
Here's two other hot chronographs.
Last edited by PorscheFanatic; 11-26-2009 at 02:30 AM.
#17
11-26-2009 | 04:23 AM
The black sheep of the family.
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,322
Damn Felix. Those are owning the Offshores. I'm falling out of love with the offshore series, have been for a while. RO is where its at.
#18
11-26-2009 | 04:25 AM
Thread Starter
| Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,524
From: Stockholm, Sweden
Agreed fully, they're too big and too showy. But I'd get a ROO also if I had the money, just for the beach and to wear with T-shirts.
#19
11-26-2009 | 04:33 AM
The black sheep of the family.
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,322
I think id go for the Panerai if i wanted beach/ t-shirt wearer, a bit more under the radar than the ROO. But hell, I wouldn't say no.
RO is def. my next watch.
EDIT: Damn you Felix.
Last edited by vtgts300kw; 11-26-2009 at 04:38 AM.
#20
11-26-2009 | 04:34 AM
TEAMSPEED.COM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 14,842
Never really liked the Nautilus. It looks great when someone photographs it in the watch box or in Patek ads, but absolutely horrid on the wrist. Way too thin for the odd shape or something, I dunno . . .
And Patek's well aware of this - that's why none of their ads have wrist shots of the Nautilus. You just get a hint of it
And Patek's well aware of this - that's why none of their ads have wrist shots of the Nautilus. You just get a hint of it