NJ passes Bill that limits Purchase of Handguns to One per Month
#51
Chuck,
The point I was trying to make is related to what you mentioned. To draw a legitimate correlation between the two factors (guns and crime) is a major undertaking. And, one has to consider the array of other factors that do, or could have an impact on the results. In the end, it's a moot point, because I still firmly believe people should be able to have their guns. However, I get a little nervous when people start making such definitive correlations and broad statements, and there is no consideration of other factors. But, I'm an economics major, this is just how I process things.
The point I was trying to make is related to what you mentioned. To draw a legitimate correlation between the two factors (guns and crime) is a major undertaking. And, one has to consider the array of other factors that do, or could have an impact on the results. In the end, it's a moot point, because I still firmly believe people should be able to have their guns. However, I get a little nervous when people start making such definitive correlations and broad statements, and there is no consideration of other factors. But, I'm an economics major, this is just how I process things.
Last edited by M5Kid; 06-30-2009 at 08:27 PM.
#52
I see your point Brian and I appreciate that you state your case and keep from name calling.
I think the main schism here is how we define freedom. I'd be inclined to say that in a real civilized society, there should be no need for a private citizen to be armed in order to feel or be safe. The law enforcement, the part of our society that we ourselves decided should defend us, should protect us. There really should be no need for private citizens to arm themselves to their teeth in order to feel or be safe.
In a situation where this clearly doesn't work, I see the need for the average Joe to own guns, but then, is not the real problem that the society can't defend and protect its own citizens?
I can't see how getting everybody in a town armed will solve the crime problem long term. This is the real problem, a problem that haven't got anything to do with guns at all.
.
I think the main schism here is how we define freedom. I'd be inclined to say that in a real civilized society, there should be no need for a private citizen to be armed in order to feel or be safe. The law enforcement, the part of our society that we ourselves decided should defend us, should protect us. There really should be no need for private citizens to arm themselves to their teeth in order to feel or be safe.
In a situation where this clearly doesn't work, I see the need for the average Joe to own guns, but then, is not the real problem that the society can't defend and protect its own citizens?
I can't see how getting everybody in a town armed will solve the crime problem long term. This is the real problem, a problem that haven't got anything to do with guns at all.
.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DJ
Teamspeed Green
1
02-10-2009 07:19 PM
Bookmarks
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (0 members and 4 guests)