Latest Supercar from the US??
#17
07-19-2010 | 02:48 AM
Avatarless
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,775
From: Malibu, CA
No, the person who I talked to specifically told me that they wanted to remain anonymous, due to the fact it could and would hurt their relationship with Transtar.
#18
07-19-2010 | 02:57 AM
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,043
From: Sunny San Diego
Im just baffled as to how a group of adults can sit around a table and agree that making outrageous claims of performance would part a fool and his money. If the claims were realistic, I could see some interested people investing some dollars.
0-to-60 in 1.5 seconds, 0-to-60-to-0 in four seconds, 1/4-mile in 6.6 seconds at 204 mph, and a top speed of 314 miles-per-hour.
Ugh. Its vector all over again.
#19
07-19-2010 | 03:02 AM
Avatarless
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,775
From: Malibu, CA
Fair enough, Thanks.
Im just baffled as to how a group of adults can sit around a table and agree that making outrageous claims of performance would part a fool and his money. If the claims were realistic, I could see some interested people investing some dollars.
0-to-60 in 1.5 seconds, 0-to-60-to-0 in four seconds, 1/4-mile in 6.6 seconds at 204 mph, and a top speed of 314 miles-per-hour.
Ugh. Its vector all over again.
Im just baffled as to how a group of adults can sit around a table and agree that making outrageous claims of performance would part a fool and his money. If the claims were realistic, I could see some interested people investing some dollars.
0-to-60 in 1.5 seconds, 0-to-60-to-0 in four seconds, 1/4-mile in 6.6 seconds at 204 mph, and a top speed of 314 miles-per-hour.
Ugh. Its vector all over again.
