Originally Posted by Pure Evo

That's true. And often coaches will play "B" teams in those games. I think they do consider that, and weigh friendlies a bit lighter. If you look below, the second bullet point is "Status of Match (1-4)" which I think means World Cup is heavy points, friendly is lightest. Qualifiers are medium. Etc.

This all made me curious, so I looked up some interesting info from FIFA:

WHAT COUNTS TOWARDS THE RANKING?
All international “A” matches played in the previous four years (48 months).

HOW ARE RANKING POINTS CALCULATED?
Points are won on the basis of a number of specific criteria:
• Points for a win, draw or defeat (3, 1, 0)
• Status of match (multiplication factor of 1 to 4)
• Strength of opponent (multiplication factor of between 0.50 and 2.00)
• Strength of confederation in question (multiplication factor of between 0.85 and 1.00)

WHO BENEFITS FROM THE REVISION?
Generally speaking, the biggest winners are the teams who win competitive matches, especially against highranking
opponents. Draws secure only limited gains, particularly in friendly matches, while defeats do not bring
any points.

WHO LOSES OUT?
Teams who often lose or draw matches will get fewer points. Furthermore, any team that records a major victory
(e.g. a continental championship title) will suffer losses in the ranking 12 months later if, by that time, it has not
gained lots of points in more recent matches.

WHAT HAPPENS TO TEAMS THAT HAVE NOT PLAYED ENOUGH?
If a team has played less than five matches in the preceding 12 months, its total for the year (e.g. for the three
matches it has played) is simply divided by five.

WHY DO TEAMS SOMETIMES LOSE POINTS EVEN THOUGH THEY HAVE NOT PLAYED?
The longer it is since a match was played, the less important it becomes for the ranking. This continues until,
after four years, the match no longer has any impact on the calculation of the ranking. As a result, it is possible
for teams to climb or fall in the ranking even if they have not played.

WHY IS THE RANKING NOT CALCULATED EXCLUSIVELY ON THE BASIS OF RESULTS IN MAJOR COMPETITIONS?
Because it would mean that small associations would not even make it into the ranking as they never qualify for
the top events. Moreover, the statistics show that 50% of matches taken into account in the ranking between
2002-2005 were friendlies. These matches are also important for the nations hosting major championships since
they do not usually have to take part in qualifiers.

WHY DOES THE CALCULATION INCLUDE A CONFEDERATION WEIGHTING?
Matches between teams from different confederations (interconfederational matches) are relatively rare. The
separate regions therefore retain the character of autonomous and relatively closed leagues that are only
partially comparable with one another.

IS IT POSSIBLE TO CALCULATE POTENTIAL POINTS GAINS BEFORE A MATCH?
Yes. Plans are being made to introduce a tool in 2007 that will allow anyone who is interested in the world
ranking to calculate potential and actual points gains and monitor the overall progress of their chosen team on
FIFA.com.

WHY ARE HOST NATIONS THAT DO NOT HAVE TO COMPETE IN QUALIFYING MATCHES NOT GIVEN A SPECIAL STATUS?
Because we do not want to jeopardise the desired transparency and also to take account of the fact that host
nations have the advantage of automatic qualification in any case. The host nations of major tournaments only
contest friendly matches for a certain period. As a result, they may fall in the world ranking.

Originally Posted by The Artist

Damn rvp and his crap finishing, sneijder fed him balls through out the match but still denmark manages to effin win, and then pacman looses..
Thank god the heat won atleast!

Originally Posted by Chris from Cali

All that showboating means nothing when you lose to Denmark...

Originally Posted by Dutchnick

LMAO

Originally Posted by Ludas

I don't want to be a Swedish supporter in Kiev tonight. It's a lose lose situation.

Originally Posted by Ludas

I don't want to be a Swedish supporter in Kiev tonight. It's a lose lose situation.