Notices
Pit-Stop Discussion Forum For Racing/Track events, DE/Autocross, Professional Racing Events, Nascar, Formula 1, IndyCar, & More.

Whitmarsh suggests Red Bull ride-height system illegal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 27, 2010 | 03:14 PM
  #1  
SpeedLimit?'s Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,837
From: too far from the autobahn, USA
SpeedLimit? has a reputation beyond reputeSpeedLimit? has a reputation beyond reputeSpeedLimit? has a reputation beyond reputeSpeedLimit? has a reputation beyond reputeSpeedLimit? has a reputation beyond reputeSpeedLimit? has a reputation beyond reputeSpeedLimit? has a reputation beyond reputeSpeedLimit? has a reputation beyond reputeSpeedLimit? has a reputation beyond reputeSpeedLimit? has a reputation beyond reputeSpeedLimit? has a reputation beyond repute
Post Whitmarsh suggests Red Bull ride-height system illegal

After Red Bull dominated Melbourne qualifying late on Saturday, Martin Whitmarsh suggested the RB6 car might be hiding a controversial driver-adjustable ride-height adjustment system.

With refuelling banned in 2010, the 'parc ferme' situation means that in theory cars must run much too high off the ground in qualifying, so that when they are full of fuel for the race the floors are not dragging along the track.

But during the TV broadcast of qualifying on Saturday, on-board footage from Mark Webber's Red Bull appeared to depict the Renault-powered car occasionally bottoming-out.

McLaren boss Whitmarsh told the BBC after qualifying in Australia that, following a similar situation in Bahrain, he wondered why the Red Bulls were not "dragging their arses on full tanks" in the race.

He said it is "evidence of ride-height control systems" being in use, "which many people wouldn't have thought were permissible".

In the wake of last year's diffuser row, and the McLaren F-duct saga in Bahrain, F1 could now be set for its next technical controversy.

Whitmarsh said McLaren is now "working quite hard" on implementing a Red Bull-like ride-height system, and "hopefully by China we'll have something on the car".



Source: GMM
 
Old Mar 27, 2010 | 03:24 PM
  #2  
Alzilla's Avatar
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 31,976
From: Minnesota
Alzilla has a reputation beyond reputeAlzilla has a reputation beyond reputeAlzilla has a reputation beyond reputeAlzilla has a reputation beyond reputeAlzilla has a reputation beyond reputeAlzilla has a reputation beyond reputeAlzilla has a reputation beyond reputeAlzilla has a reputation beyond reputeAlzilla has a reputation beyond reputeAlzilla has a reputation beyond reputeAlzilla has a reputation beyond repute
Hey, if Red Bull thought of it first, more power to them.
 
Old Mar 27, 2010 | 03:58 PM
  #3  
quattro joe's Avatar
Teamspeed Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 792
From: Bondi, Australia
quattro joe has a reputation beyond reputequattro joe has a reputation beyond reputequattro joe has a reputation beyond reputequattro joe has a reputation beyond reputequattro joe has a reputation beyond reputequattro joe has a reputation beyond reputequattro joe has a reputation beyond reputequattro joe has a reputation beyond reputequattro joe has a reputation beyond reputequattro joe has a reputation beyond reputequattro joe has a reputation beyond repute
Very interesting
 
Old Mar 27, 2010 | 04:09 PM
  #4  
Alex's Avatar
I'm closing this thread.
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,610
From: Atlanta Metro-East
Alex has a reputation beyond reputeAlex has a reputation beyond reputeAlex has a reputation beyond reputeAlex has a reputation beyond reputeAlex has a reputation beyond reputeAlex has a reputation beyond reputeAlex has a reputation beyond reputeAlex has a reputation beyond reputeAlex has a reputation beyond reputeAlex has a reputation beyond reputeAlex has a reputation beyond repute
If it's 'illegal' then why is Whitmarsh planning to copy it? Apparently illegal just means "we didn't think of it".
 
Old Mar 27, 2010 | 04:38 PM
  #5  
RDuke's Avatar
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,555
From: Boston
RDuke has a reputation beyond reputeRDuke has a reputation beyond reputeRDuke has a reputation beyond reputeRDuke has a reputation beyond reputeRDuke has a reputation beyond reputeRDuke has a reputation beyond reputeRDuke has a reputation beyond reputeRDuke has a reputation beyond reputeRDuke has a reputation beyond reputeRDuke has a reputation beyond reputeRDuke has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Alex
If it's 'illegal' then why is Whitmarsh planning to copy it? Apparently illegal just means "we didn't think of it".
Hedge your bets. It it's found and deemed legal you will be competitive by China. If not then you don't add it to the car.
 
Old Mar 27, 2010 | 10:07 PM
  #6  
B4rad's Avatar
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,283
From: Australia
B4rad has a reputation beyond reputeB4rad has a reputation beyond reputeB4rad has a reputation beyond reputeB4rad has a reputation beyond reputeB4rad has a reputation beyond reputeB4rad has a reputation beyond reputeB4rad has a reputation beyond reputeB4rad has a reputation beyond reputeB4rad has a reputation beyond reputeB4rad has a reputation beyond reputeB4rad has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Alex
If it's 'illegal' then why is Whitmarsh planning to copy it? Apparently illegal just means "we didn't think of it".
Lol, good point. Maybe it isn't really illegal but Red Bull just found a little crack in the rules (If it really does have a height adjustable system)
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BLUGT3
GT
6
Oct 30, 2013 04:58 PM
Barrister
Pit-Stop
2
Apr 9, 2010 09:13 PM
dertub
Performance Series Audi Models
10
Feb 20, 2010 11:03 AM
430berlinetta
458 | 430 | 360
15
Sep 5, 2009 11:26 PM
IIVVX
Pit-Stop
0
May 11, 2009 01:30 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:32 PM.