And The Saga Continues - FIA To Review Trulli Penalty
#1
04-01-2009 | 11:56 PM
Thread Starter
| Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,875
From: Orange County
And The Saga Continues - FIA To Review Trulli Penalty
In yet another example of the FIA's inability to act competantly, it is reopening the Lewis/Trulli fiasco . . .
FIA to re-open Hamilton/Trulli inquiry
By Adam Cooper and Simon Strang Wednesday, April 1st 2009, 18:49 GMT
Lewis Hamilton is to be summoned before the FIA stewards on Thursday afternoon in Sepang in order to clarify why Jarno Trulli passed him under safety car conditions in Australia, AUTOSPORT has learned.
An FIA spokesman has confirmed that stewards from the Australian Grand Prix will reconvene to evaluate further evidence not available at the time of the initial inquiry - which took place after the race last weekend.
Hamilton was promoted to third place in the results after Trulli was concluded to have passed him under safety car conditions, on lap 57, and was given a 25s penalty that dropped him from third to 12th.
However, if Hamilton is deemed not to have provided all the details of the incident in the initial inquiry, he may face sanctions. While Trulli could be reinstated to third place in the Melbourne results, despite Toyota dropping its appeal.
Over the past few days, the FIA is believed to have unearthed new evidence including its recording of the McLaren radio conversations, which were not being monitored live and thus played no part in the original inquiry.
Hamilton passed Trulli when the Toyota driver slid off at the penultimate corner but the pair swapped positions later in the lap.
The recording allegedly provides fresh insight into the matter and the stewards want to check if it aligns with Hamilton's version of events.
Hamilton was quoted by SpeedTV as saying: "I was behind Trulli under the safety car, and clearly you're not allowed to overtake under the safety car. But he went off in the second to last corner, he went wide on the grass, I guess his tyres were cold. And I was forced to go by. I slowed down as much as I could. I was told to let him back past, but I mean... I don't know if that's the regulations, and if it isn't, then I should have really had third."
McLaren team principal Martin Whitmarsh told the BBC after the Australian Grand Prix: "At the end, under the safety car, Trulli fell off onto the grass and Lewis had no choice but to go past him, he was not on the racing circuit.
"Trulli then re-took the place under the safety car, which ordinarily you wouldn't do so I know that the FIA are looking at it at the moment and doubtless we'll have a ruling in due course," he added.
Trulli said that Hamilton was so slow that he appeared to be in trouble.
"When the safety car came out towards the end of the race Lewis Hamilton passed me but soon after he suddenly slowed down and pulled over to the side of the road," said the Italian.
"I thought he had a problem so I overtook him as there was nothing else I could do."
By Adam Cooper and Simon Strang Wednesday, April 1st 2009, 18:49 GMT
Lewis Hamilton is to be summoned before the FIA stewards on Thursday afternoon in Sepang in order to clarify why Jarno Trulli passed him under safety car conditions in Australia, AUTOSPORT has learned.
An FIA spokesman has confirmed that stewards from the Australian Grand Prix will reconvene to evaluate further evidence not available at the time of the initial inquiry - which took place after the race last weekend.
Hamilton was promoted to third place in the results after Trulli was concluded to have passed him under safety car conditions, on lap 57, and was given a 25s penalty that dropped him from third to 12th.
However, if Hamilton is deemed not to have provided all the details of the incident in the initial inquiry, he may face sanctions. While Trulli could be reinstated to third place in the Melbourne results, despite Toyota dropping its appeal.
Over the past few days, the FIA is believed to have unearthed new evidence including its recording of the McLaren radio conversations, which were not being monitored live and thus played no part in the original inquiry.
Hamilton passed Trulli when the Toyota driver slid off at the penultimate corner but the pair swapped positions later in the lap.
The recording allegedly provides fresh insight into the matter and the stewards want to check if it aligns with Hamilton's version of events.
Hamilton was quoted by SpeedTV as saying: "I was behind Trulli under the safety car, and clearly you're not allowed to overtake under the safety car. But he went off in the second to last corner, he went wide on the grass, I guess his tyres were cold. And I was forced to go by. I slowed down as much as I could. I was told to let him back past, but I mean... I don't know if that's the regulations, and if it isn't, then I should have really had third."
McLaren team principal Martin Whitmarsh told the BBC after the Australian Grand Prix: "At the end, under the safety car, Trulli fell off onto the grass and Lewis had no choice but to go past him, he was not on the racing circuit.
"Trulli then re-took the place under the safety car, which ordinarily you wouldn't do so I know that the FIA are looking at it at the moment and doubtless we'll have a ruling in due course," he added.
Trulli said that Hamilton was so slow that he appeared to be in trouble.
"When the safety car came out towards the end of the race Lewis Hamilton passed me but soon after he suddenly slowed down and pulled over to the side of the road," said the Italian.
"I thought he had a problem so I overtook him as there was nothing else I could do."
#2
04-02-2009 | 12:11 AM
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 31,976
From: Minnesota
Seems to me like Trulli should have 3th. If Hamilton didn't get penalized for taking Trulli's spot when he went off, Trulli shouldn't be penalized for taking it back when Hamilton was in trouble.
I do absolutely hate that these things get called into the question in the first place by people who clearly aren't experts on the matter and are only watching the race via the worldwide television feed. F1 finally got everything else right concerning the excitement of the racing but then screwed the pooch with horrible ways of handing out penalties.
I do absolutely hate that these things get called into the question in the first place by people who clearly aren't experts on the matter and are only watching the race via the worldwide television feed. F1 finally got everything else right concerning the excitement of the racing but then screwed the pooch with horrible ways of handing out penalties.
Last edited by Alzilla; 04-02-2009 at 12:52 AM.
#3
04-02-2009 | 12:26 AM
I'm closing this thread.
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,610
From: Atlanta Metro-East
The love affair with Formula1 is being put to the test days after the opening GP. This drives me crazy! If this steward situation continues through the middle of this season, I might join my brother and become a distant fan.
#4
04-02-2009 | 12:36 AM
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,746
From: USA
Seems to me like Trulli should have 4th. If Hamilton didn't get penalized for taking Trulli's spot when he went off, Trulli shouldn't be penalized for taking it back when Hamilton was in trouble.
I do absolutely hate that these things get called into the question in the first place by people who clearly aren't experts on the matter and are only watching the race via the worldwide television feed. F1 finally got everything else right concerning the excitement of the racing but then screwed the pooch with horrible ways of handing out penalties.
I do absolutely hate that these things get called into the question in the first place by people who clearly aren't experts on the matter and are only watching the race via the worldwide television feed. F1 finally got everything else right concerning the excitement of the racing but then screwed the pooch with horrible ways of handing out penalties.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Barrister
Pit-Stop
2
04-13-2010 03:32 PM
Bookmarks
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)