F10 M5 AWD Confirmed by BMW!
May 4, 2011 | 04:39 PM
#31
Teamspeed Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 873
From: Minnesota US
I would seriously consider the AWD option for Minnesota. I really like just about everything about the new M5 too.
Most likely I would stick with RWD though, and just get something with a little more ground clearance and AWD when it is needed.
Most likely I would stick with RWD though, and just get something with a little more ground clearance and AWD when it is needed.
May 5, 2011 | 12:35 AM
#32
Teamspeed Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 917
From: Philadelphia Area
An awd m6 would be my dream haha. If you want a car to do the drift stuff in, go get a m3 and have fun, the m5 and m6 really are GT cars in purpose, and with 550+ hp...an AWD beast sounds more than fun to me!
May 5, 2011 | 03:00 PM
#34
Teamspeed Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 873
From: Minnesota US
From my personal feeling AWD cars just feel too 'heavy'. That takes a little more concentration to drive, which detracts from the GT feeling.
If/When I get a new M5, it will be RWD. I will have a truck (F-150) or small SUV (Evoque, Cajun) for the winter.
If/When I get a new M5, it will be RWD. I will have a truck (F-150) or small SUV (Evoque, Cajun) for the winter.
May 6, 2011 | 12:43 PM
#36
Teamspeed's Mr. Spock
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,947
From: Los Angeles
Porsche and Ferrari used to be mentioned in the same sentence.
You know, 993 Turbo and 355.
Now, Porsche makes automatic trucks, and not even the Turbo have a dry sump engine.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Saudi_Ferrari
Aventador | Huracán | Murcielago | Gallardo
18
Nov 24, 2008 03:09 PM
Bookmarks
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)