Thanks to RINO governator and to the Democrats.

AB962 is now law.

A lawsuit is in the works, but remember, this is what a state or country looks like being run by Democrats and a governer who has a Democrat wife.

They are going after your ammo, and your guns.

Make no mistake about it.

 

Cali is behind on this one (surprisingly). I've tried to buy ammo via the internet and ship it to jersey. No such luck.

 

The lawsuit is based on this:

49 USC §14501(c)(1):

(1) General rule. Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3), a State, political subdivision of a State, or political authority of 2 or more States may not enact or enforce a law, regulation, or other provision having the force and effect of law related to a price, route, or service of any motor carrier (other than a carrier affiliated with a direct air carrier covered by section 41713 (b)(4)) or any motor private carrier, broker, or freight forwarder with respect to the transportation of property.

49 USC §41713:

§41713. Preemption of authority over prices, routes, and service

(a) Definition. In this section, “State” means a State, the District of Columbia, and a territory or possession of the United States.

(b) Preemption.
(1) Except as provided in this subsection, a State, political subdivision of a State, or political authority of at least 2 States may not enact or enforce a law, regulation, or other provision having the force and effect of law related to a price, route, or service of an air carrier that may provide air transportation under this subpart.
…
(4) Transportation by air carrier or carrier affiliated with a direct air carrier.—
(A) General rule.— Except as provided in subparagraph (B), a State, political subdivision of a State, or political authority of 2 or more States may not enact or enforce a law, regulation, or other provision having the force and effect of law related to a price, route, or service of an air carrier or carrier affiliated with a direct air carrier through common controlling ownership when such carrier is transporting property by aircraft or by motor vehicle (whether or not such property has had or will have a prior or subsequent air movement).

 

So once again, in a state with no money, the state will have to spend monty defending the lawsuit.

Awesome aint it, Democrats.

 

^ Gotta love 'em

 

Oh well, it gives me a reason to go to AZ or NV more often.

 

You don't honestly believe that private citizens in California are going to be allowed to purchase any guns, including hunting within the next 5 years and are allowed to continue to own the already purchased and owned weapons within the next 10 years?

Come on, you got amazing sunsets, that should be enough ....

 

Does California think this is a reasonable regulation?

Should be based on this:

"the right of people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"

 

That is why we call it The People's Republic of California.... Actually, I am crying on the inside and feel nauseous...

 

Ok, mr 20 round mag Maryland.

I kid, I kid.