In terms of looks and price yeah, Paganis look much better but yes when talking about engineering Bugatti has made something extraordinary

 

Speed?
But i'm not talking about out-classing...That's when you can compare two, three, four different cars; here you can't. To me Bugatti is just on the complete opposite end of the spectrum from K'egg, and Pagani especially.

 

And i did say earlier that it really is a magnificent feat of engineering, there's no doubt about that!
It's just unappealing to me, even without being compared to anything; i just don't like it.

 

Complete opposite? Explain! In my book they are direct competitors. Speed, price, looks, engineering ect.

 

Nice, nice, nice! Lovin' it.

Thanks for the post and for the pics too. Looking forward to seeing more in March.

 

Well ok maybe not complete opposite.
But to me, for example, a Zonda and a Veyron just can't be compared to each other...I certainly don't mean to argue here...A Zonda is meant for the track; put a Veyron on the track and it would look like an elephant in the cheetah exhibit at the zoo. Just my opinion.

 

Debate is good! For the record I like all 3 cars. The veyron is a large heave car, but it put down one of the fastest laps around the topgear track. Faster then the zonda. I can't wait to see the agera do a lap seeing as it out accelerates the veyron super sports.
Bugatti Veyron Super Sport TopGear Lap - YouTube

 

Respekt

 

Hehe i've seen that one don't worry. ;D But i'm certainly not trying to bash the Veyron! I'm just saying that in order to compare to two cars effectively and accurately, they need to be able to "prove themselves". For me it just seems awkward to say that the environments and scenarios that these cars would prove themselves in are the same...they are both amazing feats both technologically and aesthetically, but to say one is better than the other just seems...meh.

Sent from my HTC Evo Shift using Teamspeed

 

Love it. I don't see a reason to put another 200 hp in this car, but it is amazing.