Notices
Photography | Art Show off your artistic side! Talk about the latest gear and trends in the world of photography and fine Art here!

Ultra-wide lens, thoughts?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 01:48 PM
  #1  
Andrew's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,258
From: Palo Alto, CA
Andrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond repute
Ultra-wide lens, thoughts?

Still in search of a lens to replace the kit lens on my T1i (cropped sensor). I'm considering getting an ultra-wide zoom, possibly this one:

EOS (SLR) Camera Systems - Ultra-Wide Zoom - EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - Canon USA Consumer Products

and then also picking up a longer prime lens, like an 85mm. The kit lens will suffice for a walk-about lens on vacations and what not, and for more artistic shots, I feel like the ultra-wide would be great. Any thoughts? I want to be able to shoot indoors and outdoors, but won't really going for portraits or anything. For candid shots, I think I'd use a telephoto, since I'm unlikely to walk up and ask for permission.
 
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 03:11 PM
  #2  
Alzilla's Avatar
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 31,976
From: Minnesota
Alzilla has a reputation beyond reputeAlzilla has a reputation beyond reputeAlzilla has a reputation beyond reputeAlzilla has a reputation beyond reputeAlzilla has a reputation beyond reputeAlzilla has a reputation beyond reputeAlzilla has a reputation beyond reputeAlzilla has a reputation beyond reputeAlzilla has a reputation beyond reputeAlzilla has a reputation beyond reputeAlzilla has a reputation beyond repute
I wouldn't recommend that combo as your only two lenses. Maybe the Canon 10-22 and then a Sigma 24-70 or something, but I wouldn't jump straight from an ultrawide to an 85mm. Just my $0.02.
 
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 03:14 PM
  #3  
CrazyRuskie's Avatar
Because I said so.
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,976
From: Seattle area
CrazyRuskie has a reputation beyond reputeCrazyRuskie has a reputation beyond reputeCrazyRuskie has a reputation beyond reputeCrazyRuskie has a reputation beyond reputeCrazyRuskie has a reputation beyond reputeCrazyRuskie has a reputation beyond reputeCrazyRuskie has a reputation beyond reputeCrazyRuskie has a reputation beyond reputeCrazyRuskie has a reputation beyond reputeCrazyRuskie has a reputation beyond reputeCrazyRuskie has a reputation beyond repute
I would get the Tokina 11-16mm F/2.8 for your UWA. I loved that lens.

Tokina - 11-16mm f/2.8 AT-X 116 Pro DX Autofocus - ATX116PRODXC

They seem to almost always be out of stock, but you should be able to find a good used one.
 
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 03:23 PM
  #4  
Andrew's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,258
From: Palo Alto, CA
Andrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Alzilla
I wouldn't recommend that combo as your only two lenses. Maybe the Canon 10-22 and then a Sigma 24-70 or something, but I wouldn't jump straight from an ultrawide to an 85mm. Just my $0.02.
True, but I'd have the 18-55 kit lens, which is actually not horrible for walk-around photography. Good point though, I wouldn't only want an 85 and an ultra-wide.
 
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 03:25 PM
  #5  
Andrew's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,258
From: Palo Alto, CA
Andrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by CrazyRuskie
I would get the Tokina 11-16mm F/2.8 for your UWA. I loved that lens.

Tokina - 11-16mm f/2.8 AT-X 116 Pro DX Autofocus - ATX116PRODXC

They seem to almost always be out of stock, but you should be able to find a good used one.
I looked at that, as well as the Tokina 12-24, but several reviews seemed to prefer the canon 10-22.
 
Old Jul 8, 2010 | 01:49 PM
  #6  
Tyler's Avatar
Teamspeed Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 384
From: Alamo Heights, Texas
Tyler has a reputation beyond reputeTyler has a reputation beyond reputeTyler has a reputation beyond reputeTyler has a reputation beyond reputeTyler has a reputation beyond reputeTyler has a reputation beyond reputeTyler has a reputation beyond reputeTyler has a reputation beyond reputeTyler has a reputation beyond reputeTyler has a reputation beyond reputeTyler has a reputation beyond repute
I would certainly choose the Canon 10-22mm over the Tokina.

The problem with Tokina is that they're a hit or miss type of brand. You'll either get a great example of their product, or a very, very poor example. I tested several of their 11-16mm lenses last week, and all but one of them had issues with softness.

-Tyler
 
Old Jul 8, 2010 | 03:00 PM
  #7  
Andrew's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,258
From: Palo Alto, CA
Andrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond repute
Thanks for the input guys, just picked up a Canon 10-22 from a local guy today for $600. Basically brand new - stoked!
 
Old Jul 8, 2010 | 03:22 PM
  #8  
Chris G's Avatar
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,034
From: Tampa / Naples, FL
Chris G has a reputation beyond reputeChris G has a reputation beyond reputeChris G has a reputation beyond reputeChris G has a reputation beyond reputeChris G has a reputation beyond reputeChris G has a reputation beyond reputeChris G has a reputation beyond reputeChris G has a reputation beyond reputeChris G has a reputation beyond reputeChris G has a reputation beyond reputeChris G has a reputation beyond repute
The 10-22mm is a solid lens. I use it quite a bit for just about everything. (Minus portraits and things due to distortion)

You'd be amazed at how much you can fit in your photos with that lens. My 10-22mm has more than paid itself off over time with real estate / commercial work I've done. Very solid investment as there really is a significant difference on the cropped sensors from 10-22mm vs 24-70mm.

Here are some example photos I've taken with my 10-22mm:







Looking forward to seeing some of your photos with the lens!
 

Last edited by Chris G; Jul 8, 2010 at 03:25 PM.
Old Jul 8, 2010 | 03:31 PM
  #9  
Andrew's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,258
From: Palo Alto, CA
Andrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew has a reputation beyond repute
Great photos Chris! Looking forward to taking some of my own.
 
Old Jul 8, 2010 | 03:46 PM
  #10  
Zorro's Avatar
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,871
From: Montreal, CA
Zorro has a reputation beyond reputeZorro has a reputation beyond reputeZorro has a reputation beyond reputeZorro has a reputation beyond reputeZorro has a reputation beyond reputeZorro has a reputation beyond reputeZorro has a reputation beyond reputeZorro has a reputation beyond reputeZorro has a reputation beyond reputeZorro has a reputation beyond reputeZorro has a reputation beyond repute
I actually just got the Tokina 12-24 over the Canon.

Reason #1, I feel the 10-22's distortion at 10mm is really strange and uneven.
Reason #2, I paid 300$ for the Tokina, the Canon is 900$.

Haven't shot with it yet, but my camera should be back from repair next week, can't wait to play with it!

I would've gotten the 11-16 (for the f2.8), but it would be totally impractical as a walkaround lens. Going up to 24mm should make it alright, I hope. I also carry a nifty fifty 1.8.
 

Last edited by Zorro; Jul 8, 2010 at 03:50 PM.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:02 AM.