So i'm in the market for either the Nikkor 50mm Prime AF 1.4, or 1.8 aperture. There's a significant difference in price, ~ $320 v. $120. is it worth it? Is the 1.4 that much sharper and faster in low light compared to the 1.8?

Anyone with either of these lenses please chime in with your thoughts. I'll be in NY next week and will be visiting BH Photo Video to pick something up.

Thanks,
Narbeh

 

no big difference....get the 1.8

 

I love my Nikkor 50 f/1.4 but Chris is right. The money you save with the 50 1.8 could be better allocated towards other, pricier lenses.

 

Chris, thanks for the reply. Have you used both? What are you basing your opinion on? Thanks buddy.

 

I have used both and really didn't notice any difference....if you are in super low light all the time get the 1.4 though

 

Thx. I already have a Nikkor 18-200, so the 50mm prime will likely be my last purchase for a while. I'll play with the 1.8 tonight (my friend has one) and see how it works at night.

-ns

 

Not in low light much, to be honest. But when I am, I'd like to have a faster lens. Maybe the 1.8 is the way to go. I'll let you know.

 

no need to let me know....











jk haha

 

Haha...

 

imo,
both great lens. if you are on a tight budget, the 1.8 is wonderful, but if you got the coin and need the extra stop, the 1.4 has more flexibility. Check out the below link for more info to help narrow your needs:

Nikon 50mm Lens Comparison



..