ML63 vs Cayenne Turbo - Mini Cooper S vs Carrera S

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jun 25, 2009 | 03:25 PM

Mike S

Thread Starter

Teamspeed Pro

Joined: May 2008

Posts: 4,063

ML63 vs Cayenne Turbo - Mini Cooper S vs Carrera S

Made these videos tonight of my cars with the help of my cousin. I need to teach him how to shift in the Mini

ML63 vs CTT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VzE8jp54oto

Cooper S vs Carrera S
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujkEZx09GQg

Last edited by Mike S; Jun 25, 2009 at 10:59 PM.

Jun 25, 2009 | 03:29 PM

KENT

Teamspeed Pro

Joined: Jul 2008

Posts: 1,199

From: TX

I wouldn't think the ML63 was that much faster, impressive.

Jun 25, 2009 | 03:30 PM

Mr Kram

Teamspeed Pro

Joined: Jan 2008

Posts: 4,350

From: Cali, Hawaii, TX

looks like the CTT needs some mods.

Jun 25, 2009 | 03:40 PM

AudiRS

Teamspeed Pro

Joined: May 2008

Posts: 2,301

From: DC

What year is your turbo?
I think the results would have been much closer if you started at a high rpm. Looks like you suffered from turbo lag at the beginning.

Jun 25, 2009 | 03:42 PM

Mike S

Thread Starter

Teamspeed Pro

Joined: May 2008

Posts: 4,063

Yes turbolag was a killer. Keep in mind I live 4600ft above sea level, at the coast it would have been a different story. Cayenne is a MY2006.

Jun 25, 2009 | 04:07 PM

ECB

Teamspeed Pro

Joined: Feb 2009

Posts: 7,647

From: Munich,Germany

wow,that`s suprising...
thought that it`d be much closer between the SUVs.

Jun 25, 2009 | 06:24 PM

AudiRS

Teamspeed Pro

Joined: May 2008

Posts: 2,301

From: DC

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike S

Yes turbolag was a killer. Keep in mind I live 4600ft above sea level, at the coast it would have been a different story. Cayenne is a MY2006.

Actually the difference would have been larger at sea level. NA engines suffer much more at elevation than turbocharged engines because boost pressure compensates to a certain extent for the loss of atmospheric pressure. Hope that helps.