Yer buying it to drive at least 500 miles (hopefully more) per year - NOT as a garage queen.

ASSUME THEY EACH COST THE SAME. A LOT, BUT THE SAME. SAY $500K

And no, I'm not buying an Enzo, F50 or any such silly thing. Just curious about what the Terror Speed brain trust thinks.

 

But don't Enzo's cost more than a mil?

 

My favorite of the 4 is the GTO, but like 50.5%/49.5% against the F40.

The F50 is ugly and shouldn't have been a predecessor to the F40, and the Enzo looked decent until the FXX looked better.

 

It's a fantasy game to take price out to see which car you like the best to DRIVE.

 

F50 for me. I can't really explain why other than I've wanted one since I was 5 years old.

EDIT: F50 came out in 1995. I was 9 at the time, but I knew I wanted one when I was 5 anyway.

 

You are supposed to comedy vote for the McLaren, duh.

 

How would mere mortals such as ourselves ever even know which one we would like best to drive? Having said that, i'd take an Enzo, I think.

 

My decision is based firmly on looks, imagination on how it drives/sounds, and experience with Forza/Gran Turismo.

 

I have to say F40. It's not the fastest of the group, but its the one I'd want in my collection. I road in an F50 when I was about twelve and I will never as long as I live forget that experience, so good choice Alex. 288 GTO is the car I had on my wall as a very young kid and for a while was my favorite, however, I doubt the 'experience' could compare to any of the others in the list. In my mind the Enzo doesn't factor b/c its seems like a pipe dream car and being something of a realist I can't really consider it.

 

But it wasn't on the list! The McLaren is my safety vote every time though. Just doesn't get any better.