FF Tested by Italian mags - 0-100 3.6 Seconds!
Jul 24, 2011 | 04:26 AM
#11
Teamspeed Contributing Editor
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 278
From: Perth, Western Australia
It's double the price of the Rapide (well, at least here in Australia) and one-and-a-half times more than the Panamera Turbo S so it's not really going to be cross-shopped against those two, is it?
Great specs and can't wait for my road test later on.
Great specs and can't wait for my road test later on.
Jul 31, 2011 | 11:28 PM
#14
Teamspeed Rookie
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 7
after Chris Harris' article on Jalopnik
How Ferrari spins
there is no way i will believe in any Ferrari stats.
How Ferrari spins
there is no way i will believe in any Ferrari stats.
Aug 1, 2011 | 10:18 AM
#16
Teamspeed Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 180
Although I am not sure if I would ever consider purchasing an FF, I do think it looks cool and performs very well.
I don't understand why anyone is comparing this two-door hatchback to the Panamera or Rapide. I know that the FF has four seats, but these cars are not in the same class.
I don't understand why anyone is comparing this two-door hatchback to the Panamera or Rapide. I know that the FF has four seats, but these cars are not in the same class.
Last edited by NAPO; Aug 1, 2011 at 10:20 AM.
Aug 11, 2011 | 08:56 AM
#20
Teamspeed Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 51
^^^
win?
Bloody impressive performance by Ferrari, but the fact remains that the FF is not in the same class as the Rapide/Panamera, which are luxury cars with some power under the bonnet. The FF is a hatchback with power under the bonnet. I see quite a difference.
win?
Bloody impressive performance by Ferrari, but the fact remains that the FF is not in the same class as the Rapide/Panamera, which are luxury cars with some power under the bonnet. The FF is a hatchback with power under the bonnet. I see quite a difference.
Last edited by OrangeOpti; Aug 11, 2011 at 08:58 AM.