S63, S65, or Panamera Turbo?
Mar 7, 2011 | 02:42 PM
#61
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,094
From: Philadelphia
Congrats on the purchase!
In reading this thread again I didn't realize I had posted in it and I must have been drunk or something b/c I would def take the Panamera over a S-Class any day of the week....enjoy!
In reading this thread again I didn't realize I had posted in it and I must have been drunk or something b/c I would def take the Panamera over a S-Class any day of the week....enjoy!
Mar 7, 2011 | 04:59 PM
#64
Teamspeed Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 92
From: Italy
S65 is a supercar: you can feel how special is it.. I don't like s63.
Panamera Turbo is a very good car: faster on track, of course, faster 0-60 (not 60-120) but is only a very good car. A bit soulness... More pratical, cheaper and new. I changed my s65 (2008) for panamera turbo last year... I sold the panamera. I miss my black s65! A deeply experience
Panamera Turbo is a very good car: faster on track, of course, faster 0-60 (not 60-120) but is only a very good car. A bit soulness... More pratical, cheaper and new. I changed my s65 (2008) for panamera turbo last year... I sold the panamera. I miss my black s65! A deeply experience
Mar 7, 2011 | 05:04 PM
#67
Teamspeed's Howitzer
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,273
S65 is a supercar: you can feel how special is it.. I don't like s63.
Panamera Turbo is a very good car: faster on track, of course, faster 0-60 (not 60-120) but is only a very good car. A bit soulness... More pratical, cheaper and new. I changed my s65 (2008) for panamera turbo last year... I sold the panamera. I miss my black s65! A deeply experience
Panamera Turbo is a very good car: faster on track, of course, faster 0-60 (not 60-120) but is only a very good car. A bit soulness... More pratical, cheaper and new. I changed my s65 (2008) for panamera turbo last year... I sold the panamera. I miss my black s65! A deeply experience
