My old 996tt pics from european car
#2
#4
but that was 8 years ago.
This time i will try to built a spyder with a new dream team!
I am open to all vendor who want to be apart of this!
So far i have
IPD. turbo mike
RSS. mike
ruger wheels. peter
performance Developments / links. neil harvey
fab shop. frank
911 design. Loren
Hamann7. Tyson
who else?..........
Trust me it will be very sick when we are done with this Spyder.
This time i will try to built a spyder with a new dream team!
I am open to all vendor who want to be apart of this!
So far i have
IPD. turbo mike
RSS. mike
ruger wheels. peter
performance Developments / links. neil harvey
fab shop. frank
911 design. Loren
Hamann7. Tyson
who else?..........
Trust me it will be very sick when we are done with this Spyder.
Last edited by sbyang; 09-21-2010 at 04:11 AM.
#6
Driver's View "Cort Wagner"
Nutty horsepower, hit like an esters rocket going off, D size at that. Very difficult to modulate the power on the track, and the chassis was a bit unbalanced as the initial turn in was too quick, which snapped the rear of the car over, along with the pitch sensitivity of a helicons powerband made for a very entertaining couple of laps. Needless to say, I was impressed with the horsepower but was really unable to use it because it hit so hard. The car felt overall like a really good PCA club racer and was easy to drive fast on the track but with way too much motor. Brakes were good--goes to show you what stock is good for--never faded. Overall, a really exciting fun car to drive, maybe just in need of a great alignment.
Nutty horsepower, hit like an esters rocket going off, D size at that. Very difficult to modulate the power on the track, and the chassis was a bit unbalanced as the initial turn in was too quick, which snapped the rear of the car over, along with the pitch sensitivity of a helicons powerband made for a very entertaining couple of laps. Needless to say, I was impressed with the horsepower but was really unable to use it because it hit so hard. The car felt overall like a really good PCA club racer and was easy to drive fast on the track but with way too much motor. Brakes were good--goes to show you what stock is good for--never faded. Overall, a really exciting fun car to drive, maybe just in need of a great alignment.
#8
Driver's View "Cort Wagner"
Nutty horsepower, hit like an esters rocket going off, D size at that. Very difficult to modulate the power on the track, and the chassis was a bit unbalanced as the initial turn in was too quick, which snapped the rear of the car over, along with the pitch sensitivity of a helicons powerband made for a very entertaining couple of laps. Needless to say, I was impressed with the horsepower but was really unable to use it because it hit so hard. The car felt overall like a really good PCA club racer and was easy to drive fast on the track but with way too much motor. Brakes were good--goes to show you what stock is good for--never faded. Overall, a really exciting fun car to drive, maybe just in need of a great alignment.
Nutty horsepower, hit like an esters rocket going off, D size at that. Very difficult to modulate the power on the track, and the chassis was a bit unbalanced as the initial turn in was too quick, which snapped the rear of the car over, along with the pitch sensitivity of a helicons powerband made for a very entertaining couple of laps. Needless to say, I was impressed with the horsepower but was really unable to use it because it hit so hard. The car felt overall like a really good PCA club racer and was easy to drive fast on the track but with way too much motor. Brakes were good--goes to show you what stock is good for--never faded. Overall, a really exciting fun car to drive, maybe just in need of a great alignment.
#9
For those people don't know about Neill he is one of the best of the best engine builder in the west coast.
check out this Power Trip - 0-100-0 History - Comparison Test by road&track
1.Ferrari Enzo 2003, tested independently (11.7 0-100-0 time, sec)
2.Performance Development Porsche 911 Turbo 1996 (13.7 0-100-0 time, sec)
Power Trip - 0-100-0 History - Comparison Test - RoadandTrack.com
check out this Power Trip - 0-100-0 History - Comparison Test by road&track
1.Ferrari Enzo 2003, tested independently (11.7 0-100-0 time, sec)
2.Performance Development Porsche 911 Turbo 1996 (13.7 0-100-0 time, sec)
Power Trip - 0-100-0 History - Comparison Test - RoadandTrack.com
Last edited by sbyang; 09-21-2010 at 03:45 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SupremePower
991 | 997 | 996
4
06-24-2013 09:46 AM
SupremePower
991 | 997 | 996
1
06-20-2013 08:53 PM
TurboArt
991 | 997 | 996 Turbo
2
03-17-2009 11:27 PM
Bookmarks
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)