Notices
Boxster | Cayman The Porsche Boxster & Cayman Discussion Forum.

Next-gen Boxster to get a four cylinder?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-03-2008, 05:41 PM
DJ's Avatar
DJ
DJ is offline
Teamspeed Pro
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Zoo York
Posts: 31,554
DJ has a reputation beyond reputeDJ has a reputation beyond reputeDJ has a reputation beyond reputeDJ has a reputation beyond reputeDJ has a reputation beyond reputeDJ has a reputation beyond reputeDJ has a reputation beyond reputeDJ has a reputation beyond reputeDJ has a reputation beyond reputeDJ has a reputation beyond reputeDJ has a reputation beyond repute
Post Next-gen Boxster to get a four cylinder?

Porsche doesn't currently offer anything with fewer than six cylinders, but much of the German automaker's illustrious history was made with boxer-style four-cylinder engines, starting with the iconic 356. Following stories in September of a new entry-level Porsche model to slot just below the Boxster are new rumors indicating that the next-gen Boxster itself will be endowed with a new four-banger.

A big reason that the sportscar maker is said to be considering losing two precious cylinders are emissions standards and the growing pressure to reduce fuel consumption. To wit, Porsche's 2.7L flat-six in the current Boxster and Cayman is the most efficient powerplant the automaker offers and still emits 222g/km of carbon into the atmosphere, a figure that's way too high for upcoming European standards. So it's clear Porsche must do something to improve its poor emissions and fuel consumption figures. The hard part will be doing so without angering its hardcore customer base in the process.


 
  #2  
Old 11-05-2008, 12:26 PM
ZEM930's Avatar
Teamspeed Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Orlando
Posts: 682
ZEM930 has a reputation beyond reputeZEM930 has a reputation beyond reputeZEM930 has a reputation beyond reputeZEM930 has a reputation beyond reputeZEM930 has a reputation beyond reputeZEM930 has a reputation beyond reputeZEM930 has a reputation beyond reputeZEM930 has a reputation beyond reputeZEM930 has a reputation beyond reputeZEM930 has a reputation beyond reputeZEM930 has a reputation beyond repute
Very weird but weve been told 2.9 in the entry car and a 6cyl.
 
  #3  
Old 11-05-2008, 12:45 PM
jox's Avatar
jox
jox is offline
TEAMSPEED.COM
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 14,842
jox has a reputation beyond reputejox has a reputation beyond reputejox has a reputation beyond reputejox has a reputation beyond reputejox has a reputation beyond reputejox has a reputation beyond reputejox has a reputation beyond reputejox has a reputation beyond reputejox has a reputation beyond reputejox has a reputation beyond reputejox has a reputation beyond repute
Goddamn Euro emission regulations forcing them to bring their average down. They've already done this mistake once with the 924 (4 cyl van engine). What good could possibly come from this?

Edit: I didn't even read the text prior to posting this. Looks like they're even admitting it . . .
 
  #4  
Old 11-05-2008, 12:50 PM
Craigger's Avatar
Teamspeed Pro
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: the north.
Posts: 5,967
Craigger has a reputation beyond reputeCraigger has a reputation beyond reputeCraigger has a reputation beyond reputeCraigger has a reputation beyond reputeCraigger has a reputation beyond reputeCraigger has a reputation beyond reputeCraigger has a reputation beyond reputeCraigger has a reputation beyond reputeCraigger has a reputation beyond reputeCraigger has a reputation beyond reputeCraigger has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by jox
Goddamn Euro emission regulations forcing them to bring their average down. They've already done this mistake once with the 924 (4 cyl van engine). What good could possibly come from this?

Edit: I didn't even read the text prior to posting this. Looks like they're even admitting it . . .
lest we forget your pretty 912/RS replica?
 
  #5  
Old 11-05-2008, 01:10 PM
jox's Avatar
jox
jox is offline
TEAMSPEED.COM
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 14,842
jox has a reputation beyond reputejox has a reputation beyond reputejox has a reputation beyond reputejox has a reputation beyond reputejox has a reputation beyond reputejox has a reputation beyond reputejox has a reputation beyond reputejox has a reputation beyond reputejox has a reputation beyond reputejox has a reputation beyond reputejox has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Craigger
lest we forget your pretty 912/RS replica?
Oh no, you diiiiiiiiiiii'nt!
 
  #6  
Old 11-05-2008, 01:13 PM
ZAMIRZ's Avatar
Teamspeed Pro
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,691
ZAMIRZ has a reputation beyond reputeZAMIRZ has a reputation beyond reputeZAMIRZ has a reputation beyond reputeZAMIRZ has a reputation beyond reputeZAMIRZ has a reputation beyond reputeZAMIRZ has a reputation beyond reputeZAMIRZ has a reputation beyond reputeZAMIRZ has a reputation beyond reputeZAMIRZ has a reputation beyond reputeZAMIRZ has a reputation beyond reputeZAMIRZ has a reputation beyond repute
Meh. The original 2.7 Boxster had about the same horsepower as a modern 4-cyl. Japanese econobox.

These 4-cyl boxsters are going to be great platforms to build racecars out of in 8 years or so when there are thousands of them out there for $2500.00
 
  #7  
Old 11-05-2008, 01:18 PM
Craigger's Avatar
Teamspeed Pro
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: the north.
Posts: 5,967
Craigger has a reputation beyond reputeCraigger has a reputation beyond reputeCraigger has a reputation beyond reputeCraigger has a reputation beyond reputeCraigger has a reputation beyond reputeCraigger has a reputation beyond reputeCraigger has a reputation beyond reputeCraigger has a reputation beyond reputeCraigger has a reputation beyond reputeCraigger has a reputation beyond reputeCraigger has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by jox
Oh no, you diiiiiiiiiiii'nt!

oh - I did!



(thats what google brought up with "Oh I did")
 
  #8  
Old 11-08-2008, 07:51 PM
Boxstergirlie01's Avatar
Teamspeed Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 654
Boxstergirlie01 has a reputation beyond reputeBoxstergirlie01 has a reputation beyond reputeBoxstergirlie01 has a reputation beyond reputeBoxstergirlie01 has a reputation beyond reputeBoxstergirlie01 has a reputation beyond reputeBoxstergirlie01 has a reputation beyond reputeBoxstergirlie01 has a reputation beyond reputeBoxstergirlie01 has a reputation beyond reputeBoxstergirlie01 has a reputation beyond reputeBoxstergirlie01 has a reputation beyond reputeBoxstergirlie01 has a reputation beyond repute
NOOOOOOOOOO! i already have to push my girl to stay up with the 996/997's on drives! aghhhhhhhhhh! thank god for twisties!
 
  #9  
Old 11-08-2008, 10:20 PM
MexicoBlue's Avatar
Teamspeed Pro
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,391
MexicoBlue has a reputation beyond reputeMexicoBlue has a reputation beyond reputeMexicoBlue has a reputation beyond reputeMexicoBlue has a reputation beyond reputeMexicoBlue has a reputation beyond reputeMexicoBlue has a reputation beyond reputeMexicoBlue has a reputation beyond reputeMexicoBlue has a reputation beyond reputeMexicoBlue has a reputation beyond reputeMexicoBlue has a reputation beyond reputeMexicoBlue has a reputation beyond repute
Next-gen Boxster to get a four cylinder?

Is that more, or less, cylinders than they have now?
 
  #10  
Old 11-08-2008, 10:33 PM
Boxstergirlie01's Avatar
Teamspeed Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 654
Boxstergirlie01 has a reputation beyond reputeBoxstergirlie01 has a reputation beyond reputeBoxstergirlie01 has a reputation beyond reputeBoxstergirlie01 has a reputation beyond reputeBoxstergirlie01 has a reputation beyond reputeBoxstergirlie01 has a reputation beyond reputeBoxstergirlie01 has a reputation beyond reputeBoxstergirlie01 has a reputation beyond reputeBoxstergirlie01 has a reputation beyond reputeBoxstergirlie01 has a reputation beyond reputeBoxstergirlie01 has a reputation beyond repute
they are 6 cyl. right now
 


Quick Reply: Next-gen Boxster to get a four cylinder?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:23 AM.