Official: Lamborghini Aventador LP 700-4 Picture and Information Thread!
Feb 12, 2012 | 04:40 PM
#1891
Teamspeed Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 51
I never claimed to have shot that picture. So I didn't really steal it. I merely used it for something non-profit.
It was just a night's work because I had too much time on my hands for crying out loud!
I never expected it to gain any publicity at all, so saying I stole it isn't really fair right?
But obviously I have the right to sort of be upset when something I actually put some work in gets used with someone else's credit.
And yeah another lesson I've learned now is to maybe place the watermark somewhere where it's less easy to clone out :|
It was just a night's work because I had too much time on my hands for crying out loud!
I never expected it to gain any publicity at all, so saying I stole it isn't really fair right?
But obviously I have the right to sort of be upset when something I actually put some work in gets used with someone else's credit.
And yeah another lesson I've learned now is to maybe place the watermark somewhere where it's less easy to clone out :|
Feb 12, 2012 | 06:25 PM
#1893
Teamspeed Poster Extraordinaire
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 23,831
From: Montreal, Qc
I never claimed to have shot that picture. So I didn't really steal it. I merely used it for something non-profit.
It was just a night's work because I had too much time on my hands for crying out loud!
I never expected it to gain any publicity at all, so saying I stole it isn't really fair right?
But obviously I have the right to sort of be upset when something I actually put some work in gets used with someone else's credit.
And yeah another lesson I've learned now is to maybe place the watermark somewhere where it's less easy to clone out :|
It was just a night's work because I had too much time on my hands for crying out loud!
I never expected it to gain any publicity at all, so saying I stole it isn't really fair right?
But obviously I have the right to sort of be upset when something I actually put some work in gets used with someone else's credit.
And yeah another lesson I've learned now is to maybe place the watermark somewhere where it's less easy to clone out :|
Feb 13, 2012 | 12:24 AM
#1894
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 31,976
From: Minnesota
I never claimed to have shot that picture. So I didn't really steal it. I merely used it for something non-profit.
It was just a night's work because I had too much time on my hands for crying out loud!
I never expected it to gain any publicity at all, so saying I stole it isn't really fair right?
But obviously I have the right to sort of be upset when something I actually put some work in gets used with someone else's credit.
And yeah another lesson I've learned now is to maybe place the watermark somewhere where it's less easy to clone out :|
It was just a night's work because I had too much time on my hands for crying out loud!
I never expected it to gain any publicity at all, so saying I stole it isn't really fair right?
But obviously I have the right to sort of be upset when something I actually put some work in gets used with someone else's credit.
And yeah another lesson I've learned now is to maybe place the watermark somewhere where it's less easy to clone out :|
Does not compute.
Feb 13, 2012 | 03:24 AM
#1895
Teamspeed Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 51
Again, I had to learn somewhere... I don't think it's reasonable to expect me to "buy" pictures just to mess about in photoshop (it was my second real photoshop ever and I didn't even expect any publicity at all). Or to do a huge search back to the source in the first place, wether I can get free permission or not.
This is a topic where we can find no conclusion I'm afraid
And I can't even ask us to agree on disagreeing, because I don't even really know where my own standpoint is.Let's just focus on nice pictures of nice cars okay?
PS I never said I mind them taking the picture without permission, I was actually excited about that. What bothered me is that they specifically gave someone else credit...
Last edited by Hotemetoot; Feb 13, 2012 at 03:32 AM.
Feb 13, 2012 | 08:13 AM
#1896
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,647
From: Munich,Germany
WEll I guess I can only agree with what MCrae said, it's a thin line.
Again, I had to learn somewhere... I don't think it's reasonable to expect me to "buy" pictures just to mess about in photoshop (it was my second real photoshop ever and I didn't even expect any publicity at all). Or to do a huge search back to the source in the first place, wether I can get free permission or not.
This is a topic where we can find no conclusion I'm afraid And I can't even ask us to agree on disagreeing, because I don't even really know where my own standpoint is.
Let's just focus on nice pictures of nice cars okay?
PS I never said I mind them taking the picture without permission, I was actually excited about that. What bothered me is that they specifically gave someone else credit...
Again, I had to learn somewhere... I don't think it's reasonable to expect me to "buy" pictures just to mess about in photoshop (it was my second real photoshop ever and I didn't even expect any publicity at all). Or to do a huge search back to the source in the first place, wether I can get free permission or not.
This is a topic where we can find no conclusion I'm afraid
And I can't even ask us to agree on disagreeing, because I don't even really know where my own standpoint is.Let's just focus on nice pictures of nice cars okay?
PS I never said I mind them taking the picture without permission, I was actually excited about that. What bothered me is that they specifically gave someone else credit...
Thanks for the PS and next time you`ll know better
Feb 13, 2012 | 03:42 PM
#1898
Teamspeed Rookie
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1
From: Lyon - France
You put your watermark on it without asking me, almost on my watermark...quite a bad attitude in my opinion.
Feb 13, 2012 | 06:18 PM
#1899
Teamspeed Pro
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,399
From: CA
Lol. This is getting interesting. What's the big deal with photoshopping some things here and there? How long did it take you? An hour or two to edit it?
The photographers spend thousands in equipment, go to get the shoot, edit in hundreds of dollars in software, and then put up their work, you simply edit the paint and add some wheels and it's your watermarked picture now?
The photographers spend thousands in equipment, go to get the shoot, edit in hundreds of dollars in software, and then put up their work, you simply edit the paint and add some wheels and it's your watermarked picture now?
Feb 13, 2012 | 06:49 PM
#1900
Teamspeed Poster Extraordinaire
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 23,831
From: Montreal, Qc
Agreed...really uncool move...im not happy with this behavior...