Nice lineup of cars
#11
Never knew turning heads was the biggest factor in deciding which car is better.
#13
Yes really, Ferrari's have been so disappointing the last couple years. They really have nothing newer going for them besides the 599 that I think competes with the style and sound and exotic presence that Lambos have. Looks play a very big part, after all, are you going to buy a car that looks like a turd? Ferrari's are a better drivers car I'm sure, but if they look like hell who wants one?
#15
yep 99% sure that is in seattle. paul's white scud, jason's cobalt 7tt, the NWRFCA president's 550 maranello, vincent's r8... i am guessing this was the event for when the lambo CEO came to town with the SV.
GO SEATTLE!
GO SEATTLE!
Last edited by wyatth; 06-01-2009 at 01:42 PM.
#16
+1 to Ferrari > Lambo
#17
Ferrari's look like hell.. ha ha, good one!
They are both great cars and serve different functions, evoke different emotions, and have different personalities. Apples to oranges, neither is superior.
But if you're buying the Lambo because it gets more stares, then I think that says more about you than it does about the Lambo.
They are both great cars and serve different functions, evoke different emotions, and have different personalities. Apples to oranges, neither is superior.
But if you're buying the Lambo because it gets more stares, then I think that says more about you than it does about the Lambo.
#19
[QUOTE=wyatth;331916]Ferrari's look like hell.. ha ha, good one!QUOTE]
Have you seen the California? Haha, of course Lambo and Ferrari enthusiasts will never get along, that's all part of the fun in these cars is picking on each other.
Have you seen the California? Haha, of course Lambo and Ferrari enthusiasts will never get along, that's all part of the fun in these cars is picking on each other.
#20
[quote=ShutterSpeed;332063]And that's why Porsche > * .