997GT2 700hp VTG vs 996 turbo 800hp K24/20g
#1
997GT2 700hp VTG vs 996 turbo 800hp K24/20g
Checkout the VTG response, looks like 997 gets the drop but it didn't, result was the same every time the 997 put 20 m on the 996, once the 996 spooled it kept up fairly well and was about 30m behind by 190mph.
3.9VTG 997GT2 vs 996 turbo - YouTube
3.9VTG 997GT2 vs 996 turbo - YouTube
#3
For what I am trying to illustrate it shows all you need to know really - both cars hit th gas at the same time, the VTG car leaps ahead ridiculously in comparison to a normal turbo car..... Next time you hear people describing their conventional turbo packages in terms of "zero lag", "instant spool", "full boost at 3500rpm" - just think of this vid
#6
play with a 996tt with a better set up.. this is my car vs a k24/18 protomitive tt
996tt vs 996tt - YouTube
996tt vs 996tt - YouTube
Last edited by Savetheclutch; 11-07-2011 at 03:38 PM.
#7
Not sure brake boosting at 60mph would work ?
There was a K16 hybrid 996 there also and the results were the same, the VTG torque hits very fast and hard. Agreed the extra displacement must help but the compressor sides are BIG so these VTGs are not as responsive as those on say a stock 997 turbo - would be interesting to see this test with a stock 997 turbo vs a tuned 996tt
That is a nice start but not really what I am trying to illustrate, it is the coming off and on the throttle once on the move where the VTG has this big advantage
That is a nice start but not really what I am trying to illustrate, it is the coming off and on the throttle once on the move where the VTG has this big advantage
#9
It is apples to apples in that my VTG car is slightly faster than the 800hp normal turbo car even taking the response out of the equation (my 720 horses are from an engine dyno are slightly better fed) so it is the lag issue I am focusing on, (my VTGs also have a huge compressor side) just how much better the VTG system is like for like (with the caveats about 3.9 mentioned before)
Last edited by TB993tt; 11-09-2011 at 04:44 AM.