Notices
General Mercedes-Benz General Mercedes-Benz Discussion Forum

Daimler Puts Replica Car-Makers On Notice With A "Crushing" Display

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-23-2012, 02:37 PM
DJ's Avatar
DJ
DJ is offline
Teamspeed Pro
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Zoo York
Posts: 31,554
DJ has a reputation beyond reputeDJ has a reputation beyond reputeDJ has a reputation beyond reputeDJ has a reputation beyond reputeDJ has a reputation beyond reputeDJ has a reputation beyond reputeDJ has a reputation beyond reputeDJ has a reputation beyond reputeDJ has a reputation beyond reputeDJ has a reputation beyond reputeDJ has a reputation beyond repute
Post Daimler Puts Replica Car-Makers On Notice With A "Crushing" Display



Unlawful replica of a Mercedes-Benz 300 SL destroyed

Daimler AG takes a firm line on vehicle replicas

Stuttgart – Mercedes-Benz Classic has destroyed the replica body of a Mercedes-Benz 300 SL. The courts have ruled that it is not legal to market the body, which was seized by German customs officials.

The body shape of the legendary gullwing model has been trademarked by Daimler AG. Anyone building, offering or selling replicas of the vehicle is in breach of the Company's rights. This even applies if the replicas do not incorporate any logos or trademarks of the Company. Daimler AG has long taken a tough approach to vehicle replicas.

As a work of applied art, the body of the 300 SL has been under copyright protection for a number of decades. The employees who designed the famous gullwing model in the 1950s granted Daimler AG comprehensive exploitation rights. The body shape has also been trademarked by Daimler AG, as recently confirmed by the Stuttgart regional court (case no. 17 O 304/10, final and binding judgment dated 9 December 2010, following withdrawal of an appeal).

A case had arisen in which a company based in Germany had built an unlawful replica of a Mercedes-Benz 300 SL (W 198 series). The first step in destroying the replica was to separate the chassis from the body. The Mercedes-Benz used-parts centre, which is also responsible for scrapping all Mercedes-Benz prototypes from the development units, then destroyed the body on behalf of Daimler AG. The certified equipment used in the centre includes two presses, each applying over 30 tonnes of pressure. The replica sports car had a fibreglass body weighing precisely 148 kilograms, which the compressor smashed into small pieces. This dramatic end to the unlawful body was officially documented with a signed and stamped 'confirmation of scrappage'.

The Mercedes-Benz 300 SL (W 198 series) is one of the best known cars in the world. It was launched on the market in 1954 as a coupé with distinctive gullwing doors. In 1999, an international panel of judges voted it 'sports car of the century'. Today, the original gullwing model and its roadster variant, which was introduced in 1957, are two of the most coveted vehicles on the international classic car scene. All the major car collections worldwide feature the 300 SL – an icon of design and engineering expertise.

Source [Mercedes-Benz]





 
  #2  
Old 03-23-2012, 02:52 PM
dieter.manero's Avatar
Teamspeed Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 902
dieter.manero is on a distinguished roaddieter.manero is on a distinguished roaddieter.manero is on a distinguished roaddieter.manero is on a distinguished roaddieter.manero is on a distinguished roaddieter.manero is on a distinguished road
I dont really see the big deal in this, it's not like the owner is passing it off as an original. Really who does it really hurt.
 
  #3  
Old 03-23-2012, 03:44 PM
Still Lost's Avatar
Teamspeed Pro
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,094
Still Lost has a reputation beyond reputeStill Lost has a reputation beyond reputeStill Lost has a reputation beyond reputeStill Lost has a reputation beyond reputeStill Lost has a reputation beyond reputeStill Lost has a reputation beyond reputeStill Lost has a reputation beyond reputeStill Lost has a reputation beyond reputeStill Lost has a reputation beyond reputeStill Lost has a reputation beyond reputeStill Lost has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by dieter.manero
I dont really see the big deal in this, it's not like the owner is passing it off as an original. Really who does it really hurt.
Mercedes owns the rights to these items, they are not receiving any monetary compensation therefore thats a problem. Not to mention they want to keep the heritage pure....nothing wrong w/ that.
 
  #4  
Old 03-23-2012, 05:24 PM
slord's Avatar
Teamspeed Pro
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,539
slord has a reputation beyond reputeslord has a reputation beyond reputeslord has a reputation beyond reputeslord has a reputation beyond reputeslord has a reputation beyond reputeslord has a reputation beyond reputeslord has a reputation beyond reputeslord has a reputation beyond reputeslord has a reputation beyond reputeslord has a reputation beyond reputeslord has a reputation beyond repute
I approve. To me a replica car of like this is akin to a fake Rolex.
 
  #5  
Old 03-23-2012, 05:55 PM
dieter.manero's Avatar
Teamspeed Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 902
dieter.manero is on a distinguished roaddieter.manero is on a distinguished roaddieter.manero is on a distinguished roaddieter.manero is on a distinguished roaddieter.manero is on a distinguished roaddieter.manero is on a distinguished road
Fair enough they own the rights, but then how is this any different than say a company creating a replica of the Cobra, or Elanor or Stingray. There are a number of companies where you can buy these shells and build yourself a cobra, or a mustang.
 
  #6  
Old 03-23-2012, 06:44 PM
Redlinerobert's Avatar
TEAMSPEED.COM
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Gilroy, CA
Posts: 4,331
Redlinerobert has a reputation beyond reputeRedlinerobert has a reputation beyond reputeRedlinerobert has a reputation beyond reputeRedlinerobert has a reputation beyond reputeRedlinerobert has a reputation beyond reputeRedlinerobert has a reputation beyond reputeRedlinerobert has a reputation beyond reputeRedlinerobert has a reputation beyond reputeRedlinerobert has a reputation beyond reputeRedlinerobert has a reputation beyond reputeRedlinerobert has a reputation beyond repute
That's overdoing it in my opinion.
 
  #7  
Old 03-23-2012, 06:46 PM
Ogaleicrum's Avatar
Teamspeed Pro
Join Date: May 2011
Location: south of italy, where things get serious.
Posts: 1,503
Ogaleicrum has a reputation beyond reputeOgaleicrum has a reputation beyond reputeOgaleicrum has a reputation beyond reputeOgaleicrum has a reputation beyond reputeOgaleicrum has a reputation beyond reputeOgaleicrum has a reputation beyond reputeOgaleicrum has a reputation beyond reputeOgaleicrum has a reputation beyond reputeOgaleicrum has a reputation beyond reputeOgaleicrum has a reputation beyond reputeOgaleicrum has a reputation beyond repute
  #8  
Old 03-23-2012, 06:56 PM
Superfly's Avatar
Teamspeed Pro
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,343
Superfly has a reputation beyond reputeSuperfly has a reputation beyond reputeSuperfly has a reputation beyond reputeSuperfly has a reputation beyond reputeSuperfly has a reputation beyond reputeSuperfly has a reputation beyond reputeSuperfly has a reputation beyond reputeSuperfly has a reputation beyond reputeSuperfly has a reputation beyond reputeSuperfly has a reputation beyond reputeSuperfly has a reputation beyond repute
I'm not a fan of replicars (although I might just like to do a Superformance GT40 one day ), but my biggest question is "IS THAT ALL THE DAMAGE 30 TONNES (60 tonnes??) OF PRESSURE CAUSES"? I woulda thought there'd be nothing left at all......

Originally Posted by DJ
The certified equipment used in the centre includes two presses, each applying over 30 tonnes of pressure. The replica sports car had a fibreglass body weighing precisely 148 kilograms, which the compressor smashed into small pieces. This dramatic end to the unlawful body was officially documented with a signed and stamped 'confirmation of scrappage'.

 
  #9  
Old 03-23-2012, 07:00 PM
bdeitemeyer's Avatar
Teamspeed Pro
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,205
bdeitemeyer has a reputation beyond reputebdeitemeyer has a reputation beyond reputebdeitemeyer has a reputation beyond reputebdeitemeyer has a reputation beyond reputebdeitemeyer has a reputation beyond reputebdeitemeyer has a reputation beyond reputebdeitemeyer has a reputation beyond reputebdeitemeyer has a reputation beyond reputebdeitemeyer has a reputation beyond reputebdeitemeyer has a reputation beyond reputebdeitemeyer has a reputation beyond repute
Spellcheck the title DJ.
 
  #10  
Old 03-23-2012, 11:12 PM
Carbotanium's Avatar
Teamspeed Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 88
Carbotanium is on a distinguished roadCarbotanium is on a distinguished roadCarbotanium is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by dieter.manero
Fair enough they own the rights, but then how is this any different than say a company creating a replica of the Cobra, or Elanor or Stingray
Because the SL is in a class above any of those cars. It's heritage and legacy is something that should be protected.
 


Quick Reply: Daimler Puts Replica Car-Makers On Notice With A "Crushing" Display



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:22 PM.