[BBTurbo]

Thought I would spark some debate. As you may have seen in my prior posts, I just purchased an F40 and a 599 GTO. But at the time I was also considering a stable of cars with approximately equal cost of the GTO and F40. I'm wondering how many of you would have gone the qty route? When I say quantity, by no means are the cars listed slugs. They are simply in a different price/availability band.

My Purchase: 1991 F40, 3000 miles, 2011 599 GTO 2600 miles

My option A: 458 Spider, Carrera GT, Ford GT and 16M

My Option B: 458 Spider, McLaren MP412C, Carrera GT and 16M

As you can see it was a tough decision. The list of cars above was compelling and they were all sitting there for the taking.

[D.Liu]

Quality. Had you went for choices a, b, you'd just be prolonging your wait for an F40.

[frshcoupe]

Me personally, I would've chose option A or B. you really can't go wrong with either but I imagine you aren't going to drive the F40 as much as you would a 458 or McLaren.

[Scott Davis]

Omg what a choice.

The purist in me says your purchase. The greed in me says option A only because I can't stand the 12c in option B.

Assuming that moneys not really an object, I'd up my limit and replace the 16m with the F40 and go with option A.

[MeanMachine]

I would ditch the options you've listed and purchase a Carrera Gt and Ford Gt and its the quality and not quantity.

[woppum]

I would have spent all the money on. Robin reliant.

[B4rad]

I definitely would have gone with Option B! I can't believe how expensive the 599 GTO and a good F40 are!

[997carrerasblk06]

having never driven any of those listed I have no idea, but i would love to own a CGT and an FGT on shape, looks, creed, and sound.

[JonA85]

Option B all day long.

[Alef_henriique]

option B.
But i would pick a GTO and an SV.