
02-01-2012, 03:27 AM
|
| Teamspeed Rookie | | Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3
| |
Quote: Originally Posted by Simba »
For lap timing, I'm sure the accuracy is comparable. The issue for me is the obvious and significant lag in the data metrics-- specifically RPM and throttle.
Granted, that's much less of a problem for something that is a consumer-targeted gadget for track days and such.
Hi again,
A 'lag' in the video can be adjusted. As any overlay software, LT allows adjusting the alignment between video, GPS, acceleration, OBD data. For the realtime views, any lag results from sensor and bus speeds. So if your car has a fast bus, you will get instant and continuous display. In case the bus is slow, it is certainly deferred. Same is true for GPS, those with high update rates have less lag then others. Processing speed of a device (which by the way is a magnitude better for current smartphones than any set top box around) is not significant for any perceived lag.
So it really comes down to the quality of the device / in car electronics integration - which is not a question of smartphone or not.
Hope that helps, Harry |